Discrepancies

A place to converse about the general aspects of flight simulation in New Zealand

Postby rocky289 » Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:25 am

Have found a few variations between Plan-G & AIP NZ airfield data.
ie runway length, elevation & bearing.
I am assuming the AIP figures would be the more accurate.
rocky289
Forum Addict
 
Topic author
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:20 am
Posts: 283
Location: Central Otago

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Oct 26, 2014 12:34 pm

AIP would be smack on the nose, all those little troublesome ups and downs, this ways and that are your FS limitations.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby AlisterC » Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:59 pm

If you are flying in the real world, I would use AIP. If you are flying in the sim, I would use PlanG, which has probably built it's data from in game. Let's not forget FSX has been out a long time now. It's as much a time machine as it is a simulator. smile.gif
Image
User avatar
AlisterC
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:13 am
Posts: 2543
Location: Nelson, NZ


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests