I was doing some testing of my new AI package in FSX to see how compatible it was and was interested to note the difference between the same locations in FS9 and FSX, in this case my new NZPN AFCAD airport for the Sounds Air/Air 2 There pack coming very shortly.
Both sets of images are at the same location (NZPN), the aerial shots are taken at the same altitude. The FS9 shots are using 75meter NZ mesh (It will be interesting to see what difference the 20m mesh makes.) Autogen maxed and new water textures. The FSX shots are using the default mesh, autogen set to normal and default water set to 2x mid.
In all cases the FS9 Screenshot is first, then the FSX equivalent.












Both sets of images are at the same location (NZPN), the aerial shots are taken at the same altitude. The FS9 shots are using 75meter NZ mesh (It will be interesting to see what difference the 20m mesh makes.) Autogen maxed and new water textures. The FSX shots are using the default mesh, autogen set to normal and default water set to 2x mid.
In all cases the FS9 Screenshot is first, then the FSX equivalent.














It certainly makes bush flying an extreme sport, I just doubt the passengers will appreciate that