Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:13 pm
by NZ255

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:49 pm
by Charl

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:57 pm
by omitchell
I'm still using Clive Marriott and Greg Archer's YSSY for 2002 (in FS9) and even that is better in comparison to this one. I do have the unfortunate situation of default jetways etc in the middle of the tarmac as to run it in FS9 I needed to remove teh city files which seem to contain the exclude for the airbridges and so on, but still far nicer quality :)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:41 pm
by Azbaz
omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Apr 2 2008, 05:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm still using Clive Marriott and Greg Archer's YSSY for 2002 (in FS9) and even that is better in comparison to this one. .................................
but still far nicer quality :)


Yeah <_< , I guess thats your opinion :) .

Not to start an argument but I myself quite enjoy it since the upgrade was released on avsim, as the International aerobridges were finally textured, plus they added the new A380 Gates and have included many more custom made models (plus the frames have improved) :huh: . I cant believe you still use Clive Marriott and Greg Archer's scenery as it doesnt even come close :o :) .

I live in Sydney and frequent quite often for spotting and find the layout to be basically 100% correct.

http://nzff.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6294, I took some pics not too long ago of the new additions :)

Just my 2cents :) , but hey at least its better then what CLS produced :P :ph43r:

Azbaz