Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:11 pm
by mjrhealth
Yes they are doing one.

Here

Be my first PMDG when its done

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:49 am
by Ian Warren
Be still a little ways off yet but not my first PMDG model but sure as heck .. Well - seriously cannot wait to see how they approach this one !

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:24 am
by cowpatz
Well if it isn't for P3DV2.0 or VC only then it isn't going in my hangar.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:32 am
by Ian Warren
cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Nov 22 2013,11:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
or VC only then it isn't going in my hangar.

VC .. ? .. not sure what sim that is

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:51 pm
by cowpatz
Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 22 2013,11:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
VC .. ? .. not sure what sim that is


....or VC only should have been.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 4:44 pm
by Ian Warren
Great how good 'VC' has got today, a 2D has really gone due to the res and detail brought up , but least we no exactly what is incoming

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:09 pm
by Chairman
Actually since it's all a big retro thing they might have only 2D cockpit ! tongue.gif

PostPosted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:31 pm
by Ian Warren
Strange how many still use a 2D, and funny enough people use the line of site point of direction indicator - I certainly would not want them driving if i was on a real plane!

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:59 am
by hasegawa
But Ian... the DC 6B was an aircraft with 5 guys in the Cockpit. I think, that sometimes in Multicrew-aircraft some things in 2d, like Overhead, Pedrestal and Ingenier-place are not bad... This may help for quick Response if needed. And without, Point... zoom in... where is the damned clickspot... zoom out again... Autsch, we have got mother earth again... biggrin.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:40 am
by Ian Warren
hasegawa wrote:
QUOTE (hasegawa @ Nov 27 2013,7:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But Ian... the DC 6B was an aircraft with 5 guys in the Cockpit. I think, that sometimes in Multicrew-aircraft some things in 2d, like Overhead, Pedrestal and Ingenier-place are not bad... This may help for quick Response if needed. And without, Point... zoom in... where is the damned clickspot... zoom out again... Autsch, we have got mother earth again... biggrin.gif

Lucky they sneezed all at once .. final words in the air crash report , "Well they did'nt see that one coming " laugh.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:11 am
by cowpatz
hasegawa wrote:
QUOTE (hasegawa @ Nov 27 2013,7:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But Ian... the DC 6B was an aircraft with 5 guys in the Cockpit. I think, that sometimes in Multicrew-aircraft some things in 2d, like Overhead, Pedrestal and Ingenier-place are not bad... This may help for quick Response if needed. And without, Point... zoom in... where is the damned clickspot... zoom out again... Autsch, we have got mother earth again... biggrin.gif


Absolutely agree. VC only might be fine for a modern tube liner, that really only revolves around the FMC and Mode control panel but as you say for systems intensive aircraft (switches, knobs and levers etc) there is really no going past a good 2D panel.
Mucking around trying to zoom in to move a switch is cumbersome.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:17 pm
by Ian Warren
cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Nov 27 2013,11:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Mucking around trying to zoom in to move a switch is cumbersome.

Arrrr .. now that's what makes it the ultimate Virtual cockpit .. Steve you off all people smile.gif , prepare and no were to go , plan check and double check even for only a 400 mile flight - this is what makes simulator so interesting cool.gif .. five peoples in the cockpit .. Ya be squeezed in so tight could could not flick a switch ! tongue.gif

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:43 pm
by AlisterC
hasegawa wrote:
QUOTE (hasegawa @ Nov 27 2013,7:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And without, Point... zoom in... where is the damned clickspot... zoom out again... Autsch, we have got mother earth again... biggrin.gif


The thing that bugs me the most is flying in turbulence, your mouse pointer is suddently no longer on the 'click spot' and you've got to try and relocate to keep the dial, or whatever, moving. Then the plane jumps again and you're off the spot again. Really annoying. My PC isn't so strong, so I avoid VC panels in anything bigger than single piston general aviation planes......... 2D I get better performance, and can actually accurately control the plane (I don't just do loops in the clouds, I'm an A to B simmer)

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:45 pm
by dbcunnz
A VC is a must if you are running wide view on 3 monitors a 2D is stretched all out of proportions bloody ghastly

PostPosted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:56 pm
by Ian Warren
AlisterC wrote:
QUOTE (AlisterC @ Nov 27 2013,1:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My PC isn't so strong, so I avoid VC panels in anything bigger than single piston general aviation planes......... 2D I get better performance, and can actually accurately control the plane (I don't just do loops in the clouds, I'm an A to B simmer)

Jimmy Jillickers , your in for a treat when MOM buys ya a new PC for Christmas winkyy.gif , scary when suddenly .... 2D .. whats that SPOOKS YA ! .. "don't want ya spooky chips" smile.gif type message