aviation wrote:If I may add my 2¢ worth.
There's nothing available at the moment that I know of which will let you run FSX with payware addons all maxed out and still get good performance. Here's my specs:
Core 2 Duo E8500 3.16ghz
4GB DDR2 800 Ram
500 & 200gb HDD+ 640gb external hdd
Geforce 8800GT 512mb GFX
Now with these specs i installed the FSX and was really unsatisfied with the results. flying around with default a/c I was averaging about 20fps with settings on medium-low, where as my FS9 IMO looks just as good as "X" with all the addons I have and I am able to run with everything maxed out and still get 40fps.
I did hear of someone who had an Intel i7 and didn't get FSX running very well at all.
That's me done, hope this helps!
NICE Specs.... im looking at having settings not fully maxed out but resonable to play with autogen on...
markll wrote:Not really answering the question though is it?

Back on to the point, personally, I'd go with the GTS250 option. The i5 one would be the best choice though probably, if you aren't paying more for it...
Mark
LoL !!
yes i think im gonna go for the GTS250 option also i just dont see FSX running off the i5 as ive heard alot of problems with it...do u also think the cpu is a fast one?? (Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93GHz )??

Posted:
Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:25 am
by mjrhealth
FSX will use as many cores as thrown at it as long as you have sp1 i think or above. The other cores though are only used for texture loading but that does help a heap as it reduces the load on core 0, whcih does everything else. Would of being lovely if they had put the ai on a seperate thread so you could assingn it another core that would of reduced the load even further, but as to the question, fastest cpu you can afford and preferably a quad, nothing less than 3 gig but as stated by others, its better to get a fast dual core tahn a slow quad., and 1066 meg ram or faster, id also go for a 750 meg or 1 gig ram card anthing better than the 8800 should do. Thats my 10c worth. ( inflation)
Cheers