New Computer

The place to ask for help or solve each others technical issues and discuss hardware

Postby stewartkingswood » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:40 am

Hi All,

Just a little assistance with a new PC my old one has finally died. Thee one I am looking at is Intel Core i7 4790 Quad Core on Gygabite motherboard, Nvidia GT 730 Graphics Card, 16GB Crusial RAM, Seagate 2TB Hard Drive does this sound about right to run FSX?
Thanks
Stewart
stewartkingswood
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:07 am
Posts: 49

Postby Dean » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:27 am

stewartkingswood wrote:
QUOTE (stewartkingswood @ Sep 23 2014,4:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi All,

Just a little assistance with a new PC my old one has finally died. Thee one I am looking at is Intel Core i7 4790 Quad Core on Gygabite motherboard, Nvidia GT 730 Graphics Card, 16GB Crusial RAM, Seagate 2TB Hard Drive does this sound about right to run FSX?
Thanks
Stewart



You will need to change the video card. The GT730 is not a real gaming card, and FSX will struggle with it (you wont be able to have all the nice fancy graphics and have then run smoothly). Look for at least a GT760/770/780 etc. The last two numbers in the Nvidia card number need to be 60 or higher, then you have a card better suited to gaming. Expect your cost to rise a couple hundred as a result, but its almost an essential. You can cut your RAM back to 8Gb to recover a few dollars if needed.
Image
Dean Bielanowski
Manager - PC Aviator Australia
The Flight Simulation Company!
Retailing Sim DVD Software, Downloads, Hardware and Accessories
Online Store: http://www.pcaviator.com.au/store
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dean
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:54 am
Posts: 576
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby mjrhealth » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:40 am

Not sure abt teh video card s have a 680 and its fine, but i would recommend a SSD 256gig for FSX, or if you cant, than partition your new drive and install FSX on the new partition. 16gig of ram is over kill for FSX 8 is more than adequate.
Last edited by mjrhealth on Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Intel 4790K 4.6Gig
8 Gig 1600 Meg ram,
Gigabyte GTX 680 2 Gig Ram
Gigabyte GAZ87X-UD3H
Win 7 64 Bit
mjrhealth
Member
 
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:21 am
Posts: 116

Postby omitchell » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:40 am

mjrhealth wrote:
QUOTE (mjrhealth @ Sep 23 2014,7:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not sure abt teh video card s have a 680 and its fine, but i would recommend a SSD 256gig for FSX, or if you cant, than partition your new drive and install FSX on the new partition. 16gig of ram is over kill for FSX 8 is more than adequate.


Yeah but if you're going with a 4790 processor might as well get the 16Gb at the time, leaves you open to do a lot more with the machine without having up add more later. What motherboard are you looking at?
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby stewartkingswood » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:42 pm

omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Sep 23 2014,12:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah but if you're going with a 4790 processor might as well get the 16Gb at the time, leaves you open to do a lot more with the machine without having up add more later. What motherboard are you looking at?

Thanks for all the advice. Don't know the exact motherboard just that it's gigabyte, will have to check through the specs and see what the cost implications are and how far the cash will go.
Ps don't tell the wife!!!
stewartkingswood
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:07 am
Posts: 49

Postby Ian Warren » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:47 pm

The 780s really performs, they all say its the processor that is the primary, funny how I compare the old FS9 and FXS .. FS9 reliant on RAM and GPU and FSX on MOBO/CPU .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby omitchell » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:20 pm

stewartkingswood wrote:
QUOTE (stewartkingswood @ Sep 23 2014,9:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thanks for all the advice. Don't know the exact motherboard just that it's gigabyte, will have to check through the specs and see what the cost implications are and how far the cash will go.
Ps don't tell the wife!!!


Gigabytes good, on par with Asus. To get the most out of that CPU I would be looking up around the Z97 series (Or comparable series) but that's just my personal recommendation (Don't just settle for one recommendation obviously) and for graphics, I would leave that to Ian or others to advise who does a lot more with them than I do...
Last edited by omitchell on Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland

Postby stewartkingswood » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:10 am

Well the deed is done I have ordered the PC with the 16 gig ram and the 760 graphics, it is the Z97 motherboard. The difference between the 8 and 16 versions was less than I could have bought the ram myself so although it was more than I originally expected I hope it will do the job.

Thanks for all your assistance
PS Ian the 780 was beyond the budget even dropping down to 8gig ram so you have to stop somewhere
stewartkingswood
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:07 am
Posts: 49

Postby stewartkingswood » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:52 am

Hi All
Well it has taken sometime to get most things up and running but I can report that the PC performs as well as I had hoped. I am running with frames set at 35 and it regularly runs around that mark. Even on fairly dense scenery.
It also feels very stable. Flying over Christchurch with the X file and Orbx it runs high 20 to low 30 but again very stable. The sliders are all set on the high side so all in all I am happy.

Not sure how to upload photos so will keep trying.
Regards to all and thanks again for input
stewartkingswood
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:07 am
Posts: 49

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:43 am

stewartkingswood wrote:
QUOTE (stewartkingswood @ Nov 5 2014,3:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Not sure how to upload photos so will keep trying.

Stewart, this link will help you with that http://nzff.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=...p;#entry8364058 smile.gif

Ive re-posted and its at the bottom of the page step by step.
Last edited by Ian Warren on Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby omitchell » Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:53 am

stewartkingswood wrote:
QUOTE (stewartkingswood @ Nov 5 2014,3:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi All
Well it has taken sometime to get most things up and running but I can report that the PC performs as well as I had hoped. I am running with frames set at 35 and it regularly runs around that mark. Even on fairly dense scenery.
It also feels very stable. Flying over Christchurch with the X file and Orbx it runs high 20 to low 30 but again very stable. The sliders are all set on the high side so all in all I am happy.

Not sure how to upload photos so will keep trying.
Regards to all and thanks again for input


Glad to hear you're up and running
Image
Founder and Former CEO of VANZ

"You land a million planes safely, then you have one little mid-air
and you never hear the end of it."
Air Traffic Controller, New York TRACON
Westbury, L.I
User avatar
omitchell
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 1960
Location: Auckland


Return to Technical Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests