100% ad-free
creator2003 wrote:QUOTE (creator2003 @ Apr 29 2010, 06:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Id be looking at the middle one myself due to it has a Graphic card ,things it lacks in is the amount of Ram of the others and only a 430W Thermaltake PSU that seems rather small ,all things that could be upgraded ..
the other two PCs look the same though i read from some goggle searches that the 4200 ati card is on board ?,this would mean you'd need to go out and get a gaming Graphic card for them would it not ..
Spot on, I reckon - thats a pretty nice video card in that middle PC - excellent performance, and realtively cheap - consider that you're really paying ~200 for that card compared to the other machines you list (factoring in the extra ram in the others). You won't miss the extra ram the others have, nothing you do will use the 4gb let alone go near 8. That PSU *might* struggle, esp. with the video card, as creator said...this page here http://support.asus.com/PowerSupplyCalcula...SLanguage=en-us says you want a minimum of a 400w PSU for that system, and thats without adding an extra HDD into it. But hey, you can buy a new PSU for it too, just be aware that you may need to, thats all.
I'd love to see your framerates in FSX with that rig too BTW - should beat FSX nicely into submission!
pilot.masman wrote:QUOTE (pilot.masman @ Apr 30 2010, 10:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>in response to above, the 925 processor is nice. just bought one myself(phenom 2 that is, not quite sure which you are talking about...
found PCOnline to be pretty good if you dont mind building it yourself or getting one of your techie mates build it for you![]()
example:
$1176.83 minus shipping, usually about $10-30
Yeah, I'm leaning towards computer # 3.
If you take the cost of the hard drive out of the PC Online spec it becomes a very similar price to the others, and they come without the hassle (or fun depending on your perspective) of assemblyI suppose if I took the case out of the equation as well and just looked at it as a motherboard replacement it would start to price itself a bit better. Hmm, worth a thought ...
Cheers
GaryThe above post is in the public domain and is guaranteed by the manufacturer to contain no references to anything illegal or discussion of piracy, although this signature may contain traces of nuts.
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ May 1 2010, 12:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Gary , Dont forget , keep your old PC , network it.
have to agree with you there mate, my old pentium D has been transformed into my file server/voice comms box. very good use for old gear. very very usefulLast edited by pilot.masman on Sat May 01, 2010 12:53 am, edited 1 time in total.Current PC - 3.2Ghz quadcore , GTX470, 750W PSU, 3.5tb, 12gb ddr3
pilot.masman wrote:QUOTE (pilot.masman @ May 1 2010, 12:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>might wanna ask the guy on the last auction whether its an Athlon or a Phenom. in the auction it says both but that would be a bit strange
have to say i would go for #3 with the phenom and the better board.
Yeah, agreed - if its a phenom, it'll perform better than the Athlon II in #1, even though the Athlon has a faster clock speed - the Phenom has more on-cpu cache, so there will be less chance that it'll need to go to system memory for stuff, which makes it faster.
Chairman wrote:QUOTE (Chairman @ May 1 2010, 01:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ok I've pulled the trigger on number 3 with win7 and a 450W power supply which I'm assured will cope with a couple of extra SATA drives, and specified I'd like the Phenom CPU, and it should be ready for me on Monday afternoon. I've got FSX deluxe here, I presume there are a couple of service packs to download so I'll get those before Monday, all that's left is to decide which of the FSX-only addons that I've scorned until now shall I pop its cherry with.
A Mustang ? A J41 ? I'm loathe to get any of the LDS or PMDG heavies as I already have them for FS9, hmmm, I think it'll have to be the J41.
Then I'll need a new FSUIPC ... And some new weather ... oh dear ... what have I started ...
Hi Gary have you thought to ask if the CPU could be changed to a AMD Black Edition - Processor - 1 x AMD Phenom II X4 965 / 3.4 GHz - Socket AM3 - L3 6 MB - Box they are only about $60 more than the AMD Athlon II X4 Processor AMD Phenom II X4 Processor 925 2.8GHz and much faster.
Doug
dbcunnz wrote:QUOTE (dbcunnz @ May 1 2010, 01:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hi Gary have you thought to ask if the CPU could be changed to a AMD Black Edition - Processor - 1 x AMD Phenom II X4 965 / 3.4 GHz
... only about $60 more ... much faster ...
No, but that's the sort of thing I've been looking for people to say for the last couple of days ! Just got the change through in time, thanks for that.
Found that Level D have a coupon system that gives FS9 767 owners a credit equal to the price of the FS9 767 so the FSX version will only cost me US$15 so looks like I'll have some heavy iron in the hanger after all keeping the J41 company - I'm quite looking forward to this![]()
pity I'm away playing with rally cars from wednesday sparrows fart until monday afternoon![]()
Cheers
GaryThe above post is in the public domain and is guaranteed by the manufacturer to contain no references to anything illegal or discussion of piracy, although this signature may contain traces of nuts.
Chairman wrote:QUOTE (Chairman @ May 1 2010, 11:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>No, but that's the sort of thing I've been looking for people to say for the last couple of days ! Just got the change through in time, thanks for that.
Found that Level D have a coupon system that gives FS9 767 owners a credit equal to the price of the FS9 767 so the FSX version will only cost me US$15 so looks like I'll have some heavy iron in the hanger after all keeping the J41 company - I'm quite looking forward to this![]()
pity I'm away playing with rally cars from wednesday sparrows fart until monday afternoon![]()
Cheers
Gary
Can you give me an update on how it goes once you have it all setup and running. Sadly my motherboard wont take that PCU I have the fastest one that it will take an AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual core 6400+ 3.21 GHz it runs FSX fine with all the settings on high.
Cheers
Doug
Chairman wrote:QUOTE (Chairman @ May 2 2010, 11:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Just for reference I installed FSX tonight with SP1 and SP2, then took the default C172 from NZAA to NZWP. Nothing else running except zonealarm and notepad, and no addons. Traffic was set to 10% but I never saw hide nor hair of another plane except parked next to me at nzaa.
I went NZAA to the city in spot view enjoying the slideshow at 7-12 fps. Then I climbed back inside and went VC to NZWP at 12-18 fps, although I did see the low 20's a few times (I also saw 5's and 7's a couple of times, so don't read anything into that). I've had jerkier flights in FS9, but only in PMDG's MD-11 and 747 where frame rates in the mid to high teens with no traffic is about 'normal'.
I'm going to drop this hard drive into the new box so the setup shouldn't change, I'll do the same thing then and let you know the difference.
Cheers
Gary
i hope you meant the old machinewouldnt like it if the new machine gave you those FPS. especially as im about to install FSX on just about the same setup
Current PC - 3.2Ghz quadcore , GTX470, 750W PSU, 3.5tb, 12gb ddr3
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests