NZFF

Thats an awesome rig Eddy. 1000 PSU may be a bit of overkill but nothing wrong with a bit of future proofing...

yea like nzav8tor said, not necessary but nice.

like ive said above its probably cheaper buying from elsewhere and getting it built by a community member or a shop in town. (IE mill tech, tauranga computers etc)

the RAID5 like i mentioned unnecessary

Nzeddy wrote:

QUOTE (Nzeddy @ Nov 30 2010, 09:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Hey,

Firstly Im not building my computer. I don't even know how to build one in the first place, lol. Steve, one of the guys at HitekSystems is ordering, building, installing OS and testing my computer. He has worked with computer for 15+ years and he suggested that I should go with RAID5 as it's fast or w/e and doesn't fail. But thanks for the offer.

Here's what he said on one of my emails:

"RAID 5 is the next up the list and you can have between 3 to 6 drives and once you start getting 4 drives or more the RAID 5 arrays end up very fast as youend up getting the read speed of all 4 drives combined together, this is why a good & fast RAID 5 array with std fast 7200 RPM Drives can end up faster than a single SSD and even A RAID 0 SSD Array, plus you get the redundancy if you have a single drive failure you get no data loss which is nice."

Thanks. Yup.

So your really saying that I just need a 800W PSU instead of the 1000W?

Well, if the guy building your PC is 100% confident about the RAID, that's fine I suppose. As I said, there are lots of opinions about RAID, and from people with 20-30 years+ experience at that. I've been assembling PCs for 12 years, and have steered clear of RAID: I just don't like the risks involved that I'd read about for relatively modest - if any - gains. I'd dispute the claim that a 4-disk RAID is faster than a fast SSD - for video editing, yes. For gaming, no. RAID is good at managing large, heavy volumes of data. SSD is good for "smaller but more frequent" data management. And this is one of the problems I've seen with those who are RAID proponents: they get myopic and forget that RAID is no a panacea for all computer ills / performance issues. Even though a heavy FPS game like Crysis might, maybe, move big enough chunks of data to make RAID effective, I seriously doubt it. My advice here is to seek a couple of second opinions of a couple of tech or gaming websites that you trust. www.techzonez.com is a good one, and there are a couple of good NZ gaming / overclocker website that will be able to, hopefully, give a balanced opinion. Note also that I've read that RAID does have a lot more failures than it's supporters will admit to, and that good RAID implementation is seldom achieved - either due to cheap chipsets, driver issues or lack of truly in-depth knowledge by the technician.

I also think 1000W is serious overkill - not to mention expensive to run - but it depends if you're thinking of liquid-cooling or a 2nd graphic card (for SLI) at a later date. If yes, go 1000W. If no or very likely not, a good 800W true PSU is plenty.

If your primary purpose for this PC is FSX dont go the RAID way! There is evidence that it actually degrades performance with FSX. One of the major US high end specialist builders (cant remember which one but I'll post later) advised against after running numerous tests. They also gave a lot of valuable advice for those considering building/purchasing specifically for FSX. I'll try to find the link later....

Personally I have had a great experience with Asus m/bs - I'm on my 3rd - (generational changes not reliability!)

Agree with comments about PSU being an overkill too - unless you are going to drive multiple high end graphics (and here again Crossfire/SLI does not assist FSX). With PSU quality is better than quantity!!! Its about clean power. My opinion: you wont need more than 750w for what you are proposing and that would still leave ample reserve. Save yourself some money.

All the best with whatever you decide....



Dart

dart15 wrote:

QUOTE (dart15 @ Nov 30 2010, 03:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

If your primary purpose for this PC is FSX dont go the RAID way! There is evidence that it actually degrades performance with FSX.

What? Guys over at Orbx use RAID0 so I don't know...

I think the its all much of a muchness anyway. Your going to have a killer system mate so go for multiple HDD in a RAID setup, SSD or just a fast HDD.
I got a Raptor a couple of years back and I still think it makes the single biggest difference to my system, load times are less, texures pop up straight away, it hums.

With an i7 chip you won't find any limits to your FSX system...!

The thing to remember with RAID is that it is easy to stuff up doing a proper installation, and it is most certainly not a fail-safe technology as is trumpeted by it's proponents. As with all things in life, there are those who get fixated on something, and no "evidence" to the contrary of their view will sway them. Perhaps they get mentally & emotionally "invested" in it?

Anyway, I was very interested in RAID for a while (both for myself and my gaming clients), but after extensive reading, I decided that there were too many "ifs" and "buts" about the technology to make it worth my while, and certainly not worth the risks associated with RAID. Sure, RAID does work. But it also fails regularly. In fact, the reports & comments I've read strongly indicate that over the long haul, RAID ends up offering no more or less security & stability of data than non-RAID. Not only that, but one really needs to use HDDs that are specifically designed for RAID, which means smaller caches (for some weird reason) and higher cost. I'd rather have a 64MB cache SATA3 drive, or a really fast SSD (be mindful that there are differing levels of SSDs - some are slow, some are fast - price is variable accordingly), or a Raptor-class drive.

On balance, I think a couple of really good SSDs, teamed up with a nice Western Digital Black 1TB 64MB cache SATA3, offer the best performance / value for money combination for FSX / FPS gaming. Having said that, it would be very interesting to put a couple of fast SSDs up against the latest Raptor drives to see which works best in an FSX / FPS gaming rig. Oh to have the money to have a play...

Ok I've gone for this:

1x 120GB SSD for FSX / addons
1x 1TB F3 drive for OS, games, etc

Nzeddy wrote:

QUOTE (Nzeddy @ Dec 1 2010, 02:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Ok I've gone for this:

1x 120GB SSD for FSX / addons
1x 1TB F3 drive for OS, games, etc

Cool - I think it's the right decision. If you've got a bit of spare cash, you might like to consider having a 2nd WD 1TB drive - either for all your FPS games, or for the Windows virtual memory (paging) file.

And on the topic of the paging file, do a good bit of digging around as to how to set that optimally - you might even find that you have to change the file size when playing FSX, then put it "back to normal" for FPS. There is a lot of info on this floating about, and I haven't made up my mind yet what is correct. The general "rule" is to set the file at 1.5 x times the size of your RAM, min & max values the same. So, a 4GB system is 4096MB, times 1.5 = 6144: that would be the min & max value on whatever drive you want to plonk it on. BUT: I've heard that FSX likes either a set size of around 4GB, whilst others say the same size as RAM, whilst others say 1GB, and even one school of thought says if you've got 8GB turn it off! My understanding is that Windows needs to have at LEAST 1GB of page file (also called Virtual Memory, VM for short) allocated.

I'm picking that the variance in opinion come down to how people use their PCs, how "pared down" their processes and autoruns are, how geek they are, how fast their hardware is etc etc. I'm sticking with my 1.5 x total RAM for now, but have also tried:
- 4GB only
- 1GB only
- no VM
- Min 1.5 x Max 2 x
The only 1 I really noticed any diff with was no VM - I got random crashes. However, I also found later that my motherboard had got weird, so it's entirely possible that it was the motherboard and not the "no vm" - I just haven't bothered to fiddle with it again.

Food for thought. Oh that gaming computers were easier, eh?

Here's the link I referred to in my earlier post - the reference to RAID0 is at the bottom of the page. Some good information and performance comparisons here to help get people started when contemplating a rig optimised for FSX.

http://www.jetlinesystems.com/performance.html

Dart out

Awesome - I've book-marked that page in case I need to refer to it. Interesting, though, that despite them bearing out what I've always thought - including the fact that the much more expensive GTX480 only provides a 2FPS improvement over the 5870 - they are still Intel-biased. It would have been really good to see some AMD benchmarks in the mix, so we know where the real "bang for buck" sits when speccing a system. Still, a useful general guide, even if not fully balanced by adding AMD. A shame they don't make any mention of VM...

would still recommend a different company, buying your gear though an online store would be cheaper. and then taking it to a company such as hiteksytems or mill tech here in Tauranga for them to put together for 100ish dollars...

would save you ALLOT of money.

did notice the lack of amd processors in those tests. its a shame would have liked to see some stats on them.

Here are the final specs.

Hitek Systems Custom Built Gaming PC using the following components:

Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
Case: Cooler Master Storm Scout
PSU: 1000w Silverstone PSU
Motherboard: Asus P6T X58 1366
CPU: Intel I7 950 3.06Ghz - Overclocked 4Ghz
Air Cooler: Aywun A1-V10
GPU: Geforce GTX580
RAM: 6GB Corsair CL7 Triple Channel DDR3 1600 Mhz
HDD 1: Corsair Force Series 120GB MLC SSD Drive - For Flight Simulator X Acceleration and addons etc
HDD 2: 1TB Samsung F3 HDD - For OS, other games, etc
Optical Drive: Samsung DVDRW Drive
Other: - 1 Year RTB Hardware Warranty on the entire PC, extended warranty options available.
- Includes Labour to physically build the PC, install Windows 7 HP 64bit Operating system + latest updates & drives then burnin test the PC to ensure running nicely before client comes to pickup.

Cool - glad you're happy with the specs. I'll be very interested to know what resolution you can run FSX at, and with what degree of slider-maxing, and at what FPS over complex scenery like RealNZ WN or AK. Keep us posted!

Yes, Im very happy. I'll post some kind of review when I get my new pc in.

Im getting the Aywun A1-V10 cooler.

I feel like Im getting ripped off. Yes, your right Sam.

With PCOnline Shop including GST $3180.71 NZD - http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj316/n....jpg?1291323692
With HitekSystems including GST $4324.00 NZD

I can save about $1k. But then the cost of him building it, installing os, testing etc which I don't know how much it is.

What do you guys think? Worth it?

Hitek Systems Ltd has a Technical Services division available to perform Labour / Technical Services to you seperately, so if you are wanting us to build up your new gaming system, or diagnose your faulty PC etc then feel free to contact us and we'd be only too happy to assist. Our daytime charge out rate for Technicial Services is $100 + GST Per Hour.
http://www.hiteksystems.co.nz/about-us?zen...674ce58ab415337