100% ad-free



Olderndirt wrote:QUOTE (Olderndirt @ Jan 11 2011, 07:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>An RMA request is already in the works - no sense messing with it. The specs call for a 400W PSU - mine is 650W and there's one 6 pin PCIe power connection.
Did you use the nVidia driver cleaner after your (failed) driver changes? Maybe there's some old driver crud screwing things up. On my last nVidia driver update (260.99) I chose to *not* install PhysX, as I don;'t have any software that uses it. You could try it without that.

Adamski wrote:QUOTE (Adamski @ Jan 12 2011, 12:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Great to hear you're sorted! I've run my fsx.cfg through the venetubo site a few times and I think it's helped my fps a bit, though I'm a bit dubious about some of the advice it gives. For instance: DX10 preview is often claimed (by others) to actually improve frame rates. It also looks *much* better (take a look at how it renders water).Went on another little jaunt today and it was back to square one so into the box it goes for an RMA - we'll see what the next one does. With the FPS limiter set to 20, it only varies a few tenths and is, of course smooth. Using mostly FTX scenery, I get by with lower scenery settings but when I take a screenie, it's everything to the right - then back to normal for the flight. My old card, an 8800GTS is no slouch but, when I got a larger monitor, I felt the need for a larger card - made sense at the time
Also, some scenery - particularly mountainous areas (like a lot of NZ) can look awfully flat and washed out with shadows turned off.
However - I think the external FPS limiter does seem to work. I created a desktop icon to launch FSX via FSX_Limiter, which made things a bit simpler. I'll post instructions on how to create one later.. Just discovered the GTS450 doesn't do well at 1980x1200 resolution and that may well be my problem.
Last edited by Olderndirt on Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests