Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:07 pm
by Kelvinr
Well, all I can say is, it speaks for itself.

https://news.microsoftflight.com/blogs/ ... ement.aspx

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:17 pm
by Ian Warren
Go bugger! Jimmy Jillickers and all those words like Nelson Mutz would say like "Ha Ha" rolleyes.gif

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:18 pm
by omitchell
I am really not surprised. It held so much promise, great lighting, depth, effects, graphics, but was wrapped up in a steaming pile and had no substance in the end...

PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:20 pm
by tomkilpatrick
I think if they opened it up to third party developers, it would have been a hell of a lot better than it was, and it might even still be going today. But ah, hindsight is a beautiful thing, isn't it?

PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:03 am
by Ian Warren
tomkilpatrick wrote:
QUOTE (tomkilpatrick @ Jul 8 2014,11:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think if they opened it up to third party developers, it would have been a hell of a lot better than it was, and it might even still be going today. But ah, hindsight is a beautiful thing, isn't it?

I would believe that has happened , we will see something a few years down the track, Lockheed/Martin .. they have there thumb in the hot pie .. Boeing , well you don't know , after all it was close to the home base, I have seen P3D in a simulator .. Yeah winkyy.gif and it was great , but still a few sniggly little prob's with it .. as long as we get away from that women yelling in ya ear hole .. DO THIS DO THAT ! it will grow !