Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 29 2008, 05:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>welldone 'A185F'
well that debunks the photoshop theroy ..
I didn't actually think that one was photoshopped![]()
I was looking for that video on youtube but couldn't find it.
100% ad-free
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 29 2008, 05:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>welldone 'A185F'
well that debunks the photoshop theroy ..
I didn't actually think that one was photoshopped![]()
I was looking for that video on youtube but couldn't find it.
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 29 2008, 05:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>welldone 'A185F'
well that debunks the photoshop theroy .. i was thinking mm not real , seemed many in the stills showed no interest .. after been to many airshows as us all ... ALWAYS KEEP YOUR EYES SCANNING ! , this is perfect example , they didnt even no what hit em ...........
Great picsobviously someone radar eyes
Aha, indeed well done...........it has restored my credibility as a poster of genuine material.........![]()
I will tell my "sources" to keep 'em coming.
TimG wrote:QUOTE (TimG @ Jul 29 2008, 03:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I just thought the P-51 looked huge compared to the F-15 in some of those shots especially the 5th one. If you look in this photo there seems to be a big difference in size, also, the A-10 also looks as if it's flying a bit off course but maybe that's just the lens. I am not trying to offend anyone or sound smart. I am just skeptical about most things on the internet. Maybe they are real but something is definitely different.
I really like the last shot how you can see the shock wave.
Thats because in the 5th shot the P51 is closest to the camera and the other aircraft are to its right, behind and below it !!!
Deane
Return to New Zealand Aviation
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests