ANZ link flight emergency landing

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby dazza28 » Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:16 pm

hey just sore this thought i would post it.

Passengers on board an Air New Zealand Link flight to Christchurch thought their time was up when smoke filled the cabin shortly after take-off from Wellington yesterday.


nz.news.yahoo.com

Cheers dazza.
dazza28
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:21 pm
Posts: 143
Location: NZPP

Postby Peppermint » Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:17 pm

QUOTE
"The engine on the right-hand side stopped. A lady there said she saw something hit it.[/quote]

Bird strike I'd say....*sigh* the media is at it again. Rather than get the PILOTS say who are CERTIFIED to fly them, they go to Joe Passenger, the sort of person who gets angry if their flight is delayed due to the weather etc.
Peppermint
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 516
Location: Christchurch

Postby deeknow » Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:38 pm

Peppermint wrote:
QUOTE (Peppermint @ Dec 27 2008, 02:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rather than get the PILOTS say who are CERTIFIED to fly them, they go to Joe Passenger


Standard procedure for pilots is no doubt to not speak to the media, in the article its mentioned that even the passengers were marshalled off to the Koru Lounge (so they couldn't speak to the press?) I guess if one of us hadda been on the flight we mighta said to our fellow passengers.. "don't panic, these things are fine on one engine, hell we could even glide on no engines for awhile if we needed to" mind you that might not be much comfort to the average fare paying member of the public
Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby Alex » Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:44 pm

Yea, I'd imagine that there is a clause in their contract that states that they are not allowed to speak to the media; there is in mine and I have a pretty rote hospitality job.

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby Matthew » Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:34 pm

Anyone who knows their stuff on FRTO will know that its recommended - if not law - that no pilot speak to the media or admit liability to an incident involving an aircraft, so that they don't undermine CAA investigations.

Thats how I understand it anyway winkyy.gif
Last edited by Matthew on Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Matthew McTague
NZFF Moderator
VATNZ - TMA Controller
Student Pilot
ICT Guru


Image
User avatar
Matthew
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 1:26 pm
Posts: 321
Location: Timaru, New Zealand

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:42 pm

Probably not a birdstrike considering the engines in ATRs/ Dash 8s have Inertial Separators which are designed to stop any large objects going through the engine.
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby Peppermint » Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:56 pm

Ah yeah, forgot the pilots are probably on something like that.
Peppermint
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 516
Location: Christchurch

Postby 2fst4u » Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:38 pm

deeknow wrote:
QUOTE (deeknow @ Dec 27 2008, 05:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Standard procedure for pilots is no doubt to not speak to the media, in the article its mentioned that even the passengers were marshalled off to the Koru Lounge (so they couldn't speak to the press?) I guess if one of us hadda been on the flight we mighta said to our fellow passengers.. "don't panic, these things are fine on one engine, hell we could even glide on no engines for awhile if we needed to" mind you that might not be much comfort to the average fare paying member of the public

thats exactly what i thought out loud. of course there was smoke in the cabin which aint good but the fact that everyone was "freaking out" just annoys me. it would have been unnerving but not terrifying
2fst4u
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:27 pm
Posts: 388
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Postby Alex » Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:48 pm

I can see where the fear would have come from (I don't think many people (me especially) would be able to stay completely calm through an engine failure) though. An engine failure is sorta separate from the other passengers and you, while smoke really brings the emergency right to you.

That and also that something is burning somewhere, fire in-flight is one of the worst things surely, not saying that it would happen, but the idea of being on a plane burning up isn't particularly welcoming... unsure.gif

Alex
Last edited by Alex on Sat Dec 27, 2008 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby 2fst4u » Sun Dec 28, 2008 7:51 am

Alex wrote:
QUOTE (Alex @ Dec 27 2008, 07:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I can see where the fear would have come from (I don't think many people (me especially) would be able to stay completely calm through an engine failure) though. An engine failure is sorta separate from the other passengers and you, while smoke really brings the emergency right to you.

That and also that something is burning somewhere, fire in-flight is one of the worst things surely, not saying that it would happen, but the idea of being on a plane burning up isn't particularly welcoming... unsure.gif

Alex

true true. i spose smoke in the cabin would actually be quite scary
2fst4u
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:27 pm
Posts: 388
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Postby benwynn » Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:55 am

Seems it was the Mt Cook Airline ATR 72-500 Registered ZK-MCF..

Had an engine replacement yesterday in the Vincent Aviation hangar.
User avatar
benwynn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 1433
Location: YBBN


Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests