I hope this will weed out a lot of the guys who just sign up for it because they can, and don't really have any particular interest in aviation. Granted there are plenty of very enthusiastic and committed people who've benefited from the student loan scheme, quite a few of us here on NZFF for example, but it seems like for every one of us there are two or three more who don't know a 172 from a Jetranger and expect to be right hand seat in a 747 in a few years' time.
This might also cause a few of the larger training organisations around the place to start treating their students like people and not walking dollar signs.
QUOTE
Mr Joyce says one approach would be to get potential pilots to pay their own way to a private licence, and then apply for a loan for their commercial licence.[/quote]
I'm glad he's considering that because that's exactly what I was suggesting to a few of the other aero club people the other day would be a good idea - keep the dream alive for the dedicated guys but discourage the ones that just want the fancy uniform.

Posted:
Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:02 pm
by ardypilot
Yeah, I know guys who have taken 2 years + to get their PPL, and heard of a guy who didn't solo till something like 70+ hours... then when he did, he pranged the aircraft on landing. You would really think the instructors would have said something like "hold on a minute, I don't think this guy is quite cut out for flying. I'll tell him to stop wasting his money".
QUOTE
This might also cause a few of the larger training organisations around the place to start treating their students like people and not walking dollar signs.[/quote]
Hear hear. I get pretty frustrated at my organisiation sometimes for the way I get palmed off to other instructors every so often. It's hard to get good consistent flying when you keep getting bumped onto different people with different teaching methods.
I've actually heard that a certain big flying school take on more students than they have aircraft/instructors available because they know there is a certain student drop out rate who won't pass the theory exams. That's real foul play if you ask me. I'd say about only about 3/4 of my theory class are still flying currently.

Posted:
Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:25 pm
by H500Fan
I'm about 2 weeks away from starting my PPL and CPL in Christchurch, I've found the selection process not exactly a gimee like I had assumed. I think as mentioned perhaps the heli schools are different to fixed wing as in they do get jobs after because the bulk of the students have a general love of choppers. Unlike fixed wing to some (not all) seems to be just "something to do" when they leave school.
I have the money to do my PPL and think its a great idea in the future to make it a non student loan area. However I'm not going to put it into the flying as I want some money at the end to do ratings and then relocate to a job after finishing, what I have left after that will go on my student loan.
My question is, lets put the same guy/girl in 2 scenarios:
Student loan start to finish on a structured course
or; Pays his/her way over 4-5 years doing 1-2 hours per week and self studied.
Who comes out the better pilot?? Forget the part where they've worked hard for it and appreciate it, who's actually better sitting in the machine at crunch time?
They have also introduced 3 business papers now which give you a diploma in aviation, instead of the tertiary board seeing no actual qualification achieved after passing your cpl check.
cheers
Jamie

Posted:
Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:31 pm
by benwynn
I certainly agree with more demanding intake requirements. Sure, I may have done just as well/worse/better on the tests for the intake (maths etc) but my Enthusiasm, and aviation knowledge would go a lot further than most. Restricting age I think is a very good idea too. I have some older gentleman in my intake, and it just simply isnt fair. Spending tax payer dollars on a whim at that age really isn't fair. If they were that keen on flying in the first place, they would have made the move straight out of school, rather than jolting off overseas or working around the globe (particular reference).

Posted:
Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:45 pm
by J7G
How old is older?

Posted:
Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:18 pm
by benwynn
Not sure of his exact age, but he's in his 40's the particular guy im talking about.

Posted:
Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:52 pm
by J7G
Roger. Some people just don't know, though, until someone introduces them personally and up close to it. Mind you, 40s is pushing it a bit I would say.

Posted:
Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:54 pm
by AndrewJamez
Ha thats funny because I know a guy who is 46 and just sold his buisness to fund himself through CTC. He's missed the 1st intake this year already because his colestrol was way up and need a re-examination a few months down the track. Never flown a plane before or never had any interest in aviaition up untill now. The thing is though everything else with him checks out and he is ready to start as soon as his medicle comes through. I think he's gonna find it hard. I do know that if he gets through, he wants to buy my PC and set him up with FSX and all, so him been inducted means I get knew PC. So i'm split down the middle on weather to encourage him or give him a reality check. Not that he would listen.

Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:21 am
by towerguy
easy on the 'old' part eh guys
some of us fit that criteria and are pushing you guys around quite nicely
and if they can get the medical and the licence then why shouldn't they get the chance to fly - the love of it isn't restricted to the young and in a lot of cases they have a wealth of experience to draw on when the brown stuff starts hitting the fan - quite often that background 'life experience' can make a big difference in decision making. (note: quite often - not 'always')
rant over
cheers

Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:01 am
by benwynn
Get a loan for your PPL then. I don't see it being fair for 'older' men and women who will most likely never make it to Jets, the whole reason the funding was introduced in the first place. I doubt the scheme was introduced due to the lack of 185 pilots or lack of flying instructors.

Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:36 am
by cowpatz
In the "good Ole days" there were no such things as student loans. If Mummy or Daddy didn't help out then you did it the old fashioned way and scrimped and saved, begged, borrowed and stole. No Ipods, flash cars or gelled hair with the latest thread bare jeans.
Of all the pilots I have trained over the years the best ones were those that did it themselves with the exception of attending theory courses. The sacrifice, eagerness and determination were a culling process and acceptance tests in themselves. GA is a hard slog and nothing gets handed to you on a plate.
Flying schools and training establishments have been ripping off the student and taxpayer for years. Why not get the student to fund themselves to the PPL stage and then provide measured support in the form of a loan after that, based on certain criteria? The failure rate is high and there is a tendency for establishments to milk students along when they should have been "terminated" (horrible word but the reality) at the early stages. There is no cross credit for aviation qualifications and to not make the grade and then have to repay tens of thousands of dollars is hard.
A balance has to be reached whereby anyone can give it a go but only those that show real aptitude and attitude get any Taxpayer assistance.
Alongside this rant from Steve Joyce is also an inquiry in progress by the CAA into NZ flight training. Hopefully the tree will get shaken and something good will come of it.

Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:11 am
by Ian Warren
cowpatz wrote:In the "good Ole days" there were no such things as student loans. If Mummy or Daddy didn't help out then you did it the old fashioned way and scrimped and saved, begged, borrowed and stole.
not to mention aviation scholarships , when the hell they invented

I missed out


Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:08 pm
by J7G
Where do I sign up for the iPods, jeans and flash cars? Also, how does one get them through their student loans? Curious minds want to know!

Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:29 pm
by chopper_nut
The student load scheme changed before I got there. It used to be that you got the cash and so people ended up buying cars and things. Now you get course related costs of $1000 each year.

Posted:
Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:41 pm
by J7G
That changed 10+ years ago IIRC.