Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:57 pm
by Naki

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:01 pm
by Splitpin


Interesting reading....just seems odd to me , the bulk of that report was all doom and gloom....but , hey...lets go buy some new aircraft.
I think it was Freddy Laker who said "if want a nice little airline....start off with a big one"

Anyway...go ANZ ....best in the world New_Zealand_etc.gif

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:36 pm
by Ian Warren
Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Feb 25 2012,10:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Interesting reading....just seems odd to me , the bulk of that report was all doom and gloom....but ,

Sorry guys .. was to say , brought one under the NZFF membership plan .. tongue.gif

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:05 am
by Charl
It's a difficult business, you have to plan years ahead and assume things will pan out.
Certainly ANZ must be getting some of the best possible terms available, and so would convert their options into orders.
As a disappointed launch customer they will be wringing their hands at Boeing's door about the financial hardships created by the delivery delays.

And ANZ will chop all those jobs, including the boss!
Amazing that Fyfe is going - not fired, not to a new job, just... quitting.
I guess it's a difficult business.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:09 pm
by Ian Warren
Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ Feb 26 2012,12:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Amazing that Fyfe is going - not fired, not to a new job, just... quitting.

On his money s .. the few years in the biz .. quitting is not the option .. yes it is , no its not , yes it is , no its not , YES it is get out while the going is good and live smile.gif

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:27 pm
by Naki
Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ Feb 26 2012,12:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's a difficult business, you have to plan years ahead and assume things will pan out.
Certainly ANZ must be getting some of the best possible terms available, and so would convert their options into orders.
As a disappointed launch customer they will be wringing their hands at Boeing's door about the financial hardships created by the delivery delays.


Yeah I agree ..must of got a really good price

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:40 pm
by Ian Warren
Naki wrote:
QUOTE (Naki @ Feb 26 2012,1:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah I agree ..must of got a really good price

They said that about ARBUST did they not , the reason a fleet change course a complete infastructure and simple maintain , loading , retrain , engineering ... financial hardships ? what happened to the forecast ... O .. forgot your fired your fired your fired , don't want you ... and you made a major cOckup , like your attitude , you can stay ! laugh.gif < SO TRUE ! blink.gif

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:41 am
by cowpatz
Interesting that they are ordering another 2 787-900's. As Boeing has decided to put the -800 wing on it, instead of a purpose designed -900 wing, it has certainly changed the mission profile and reduced it's range. It will no longer meet the requirements of some proposed new city pairings.