I've never been comfortable as an airline passenger out of Queenstown.
Not incoming, funnily enough, just out.
There's always an issue, somehow.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6529067/Pi...enstown-takeoff
100% ad-free
cowpatz wrote:QUOTE (cowpatz @ Mar 6 2012,8:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>This should never have gone to court. I have no idea why CAA have pursued it to the degree that they have. Muscle flexing me thinks and one which significantly erodes the regulators relationship with it's "clients".
I'm intrigued as to why they're charging the *pilot*. Shouldn't they be charging the airline?
ZK-MAT wrote:QUOTE (ZK-MAT @ Mar 6 2012,2:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I'm comfortable with someone being charged if they breach a rule. He broke the rule and departed too late, didn't he?
Depends on what the rule is - apparently, he was going by Pacblue operating procedures <???>.
cowpatz wrote:QUOTE (cowpatz @ Mar 6 2012,8:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>...Muscle flexing me thinksThe facts are going to come out in court, which is important.
As I said, I've had some "Strange" experiences leaving Queenstown.
I knew we were all going to die, the day a Qantas 737 delayed and delayed its take-off, then took off into a descending cloud base and dwindling light.
He decided he couldn't get out after all, and then flew figures-of-eight with us under the cloud, ever lower.
He eventually burned off enough fuel to get down to landing weight, and duly and quickly did.
I want him in court, too...
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Mar 6 2012,6:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The facts are going to come out in court, which is important.
This is the whole point of the exercise. The matter has been forwarded to the appropriate tribunal to assess the matter. I'm sure the decision to go
ahead was taken after a lot of examination and research and any emotional opinions from people outside the loop doesn't help anything.
Wait and see....?
Return to New Zealand Aviation
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests