Noise Moans in NZAA?

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby Dash8captain » Fri Aug 30, 2013 8:57 pm

It seems these days people have to have something to moan about! what about Trains, Cars, Stereos, Dogs etc?

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/art...jectid=11116530
'All things are possible to him that believes'
User avatar
Dash8captain
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:24 am
Posts: 1643
Location: Nelson

Postby emfrat » Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:09 pm

Same old same old...buy cheap near the airport, start a campaign to shut the airport (motorsport venue, etc) for noise reasons, hire a no-win, no-fee lawyer to push your claim, and then find out that planes today are an awful lot quieter than they used to be... ohmy.gif
MikeW
'Propliner' is actually short for 'Proper airliner, with big rumbly radials'

Image
User avatar
emfrat
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 7:41 pm
Posts: 4098
Location: 50 DME YBBN

Postby deeknow » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:20 am

Yeah I'd like to complain too !!!!! ... I don't hear enough of them !!! tongue.gif
Deans repaints: http://www.deeknow.com/
X570 Mini-ITX m/b - Ryzen7 5700X3D (8c/16t) - RTX 2060-super - 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 - Win10 - P3Dv5.3
User avatar
deeknow
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:15 pm
Posts: 4448
Location: NZHN

Postby HamiltonWest » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:34 am

deeknow wrote:
QUOTE (deeknow @ Aug 31 2013,12:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah I'd like to complain too !!!!! ... I don't hear enough of them !!! tongue.gif

laugh.gif agree
HamiltonWest
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:15 pm
Posts: 4170
Location: HAMILTON NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:52 am

Arrr for the 'Classic" sound of a pair JT8D's winkyy.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Dash8captain » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:03 am

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Aug 31 2013,8:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Arrr for the 'Classic" sound of a pair JT8D's winkyy.gif


Or three on a 727!
'All things are possible to him that believes'
User avatar
Dash8captain
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:24 am
Posts: 1643
Location: Nelson

Postby Charl » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:29 am

Last flight into NZAA I did kinda wonder what was going on...usually they fly onto Whitford NDB and make a nice lazy approach from the NE.
This 777 started banking essentially over the city, and only levelled wings just about ready for the flare!
- Shades of Kai Tak Runway 13 -
Sitting on the RHS we had a grandstand view of everything, including the runway as he lined it up.
Last edited by Charl on Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby cowpatz » Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:43 am

Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ Aug 31 2013,9:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Last flight into NZAA I did kinda wonder what was going on...usually they fly onto Whitford NDB and make a nice lazy approach from the NE.
This 777 started banking essentially over the city, and only levelled wings just about ready for the flare!
- Shades of Kai Tak Runway 13 -
Sitting on the RHS we had a grandstand view of everything, including the runway as he lined it up.


If anyone was tracking on the Whitford NDB these days then they would be in for a surprise. It has been gone for years, as has Westpoint, and now they only exist in the FS world.
Soon you will be able to reproduce the flight when PMDG release their 777.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Charl » Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:48 am

Yep I thought I was setting myself up for something when I mentioned Whitford smile.gif
The ex-747 captain who taught me this stuff in FS made me go out there and fly all the way back...

So what navaid were they using, before it went "Smart"?
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby cowpatz » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:08 pm

Whitford was the NDB that aircraft used to track on for the start of the ILS approach for 23L. Now that has gone and it is either all done via RNAV, the DME ARC (heaven forbid) or radar vectoring. All the STARs for NZAA lead into an approach so most aircraft will just follow them. The newer 'smart' arrivals are for approved operators only. If you look at the ILS chart below you will see that HD (Whitford) NDB has been replaced by EMRAG and ORESO.
You probably already know this but all the NZ charts can be found at http://www.aip.net.nz/NavWalk.aspx?section=CHARTS.

Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Charl » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:31 pm

Thanks CP, I suspect this is going to be too hard to build into FS9... Whitford it will remain.
What the heck, my sim is locked in a past era anyhow.
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby cowpatz » Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:15 pm

You can update your FS9 navaid and fix database from here.
Of course if you have FMC equipped add ons you can update the database thru Navigraph.

It should be all you need for NZAA. I re worked some of the FS9 approaches for various places a while ago. They may have changed a bit but if you use the FS9 GPS it will bring up more up to date approaches. Let me know if you would like them.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Charl » Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:39 pm

Well thanks for that, I've downloaded from that link and I'll have a look.
Amazing, the stuff that's out there...
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby NZ255 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:54 pm

CP, if you have an RNAV equipped AC, do you still fly the ILS approach? Or is it the RNAV approach?

I'm always a little confused and end up tuning the ILS anyway and maybe follow it down or hit the APP button. Are they two different things? (RNAV app and ILS app)
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby SA227 » Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:12 pm

QUOTE
CP, if you have an RNAV equipped AC, do you still fly the ILS approach? Or is it the RNAV approach?[/quote]
either or. You need to be RNAV equipped to fly the STAR which will get you to the start of either the ILS or RNAV approach. The ILS is a precision approach which will get you to lower minima for the bad days where as the RNAV is non precision with higher minima.
The IFLY 737 flies both approaches well.

Oh yeah forgot to mention there are of course a couple of different RNAV approaches. The X and Y have RNP requirements and have a shortened final approach. They also have different STAR's so the STAR used to get you to the ILS wont get you to the start of these RNAV approaches.

Still confused?? biggrin.gif
Last edited by SA227 on Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SA227
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:11 pm
Posts: 368

Postby cowpatz » Wed Sep 04, 2013 4:45 pm

Like he said whathesaid.gif

If you look at some of the Aussie charts via the VATPAC website you will notice that they have a million charts as they often have separate STARs for RNAV and ILS approaches even though the approaches start at the same place.
I think that someone gets paid by the chart!
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby NZ255 » Sun Sep 22, 2013 4:08 am

Just mucking around, the RNP (SMART) 23LX arrival semi-visualised.

The green path is the BASIV6A STAR which I believe is the standard 23L approach for arrivals from the West (CP, SA?)

Couldn't slope path so altitude is next point's altitude.

Last edited by NZ255 on Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:56 am

I do like the way you did that ... if I was to move to Auckland i no were i can buy a place ... East Tamaki is a little to far out ... i wonder about the district RW23L winkyy.gif
Last edited by Ian Warren on Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby cowpatz » Sun Sep 22, 2013 9:20 am

Well done. You have captured both arrivals well.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby SA227 » Sun Sep 22, 2013 9:39 am

That is neat.
SA227
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:11 pm
Posts: 368

Next

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests