Page 1 of 2

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:09 am
by hasegawa
The Carenado Beech 1900D seemed to be equipped with an FMC, but have original BEEch 1900D this also?

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:01 am
by Ian Warren
Andreas, Were yet to here from our in-house real deal flyer James AKA"goingboeing" cool.gif

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:39 am
by goingboeing
hey guys haven't had a chance to try out the carenado beast yet, our beeches don't have autopilot or FMC and our GPS units are much older than the ones on the carenado screenshots.
aside from that apart from small differences it looks pretty darn good, shame you can't remove the coat locker and add an extra seat as well

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:47 am
by deeknow
As GB says there's no AP (apparently an optional extra for the BEH?), I think the GPS is a Bendix King model 90B or something, pic of a Eagle panel here...

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:57 am
by gojozoom
This GPS unit is used in the Aerosoft Catalina and the Flight1 BN-2 Islander, so the 2D panel version of those could be brought over to the Beech if you have them.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 10:41 am
by Ian Warren
goingboeing wrote:
QUOTE (goingboeing @ Jan 9 2014,9:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
hey guys haven't had a chance to try out the carenado beast yet, our beeches don't have autopilot or FMC

Real Mans Flying - RMF tongue.gif , I can guess many prefer ripping around in a son of a beech rather than FMCs and update GPSs, is that a confirm with the RMF.

Dean, great posting the cockpit photo cool.gif

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:19 pm
by SeanTK
Wow, surprised to learn that you guys don't have autopilots in your 1900s! Is that across the whole fleet, or do some planes have varying equipment?

Also, what are your typical cruising altitudes for various route lengths? I know the ceiling is listed as FL250, so I'm assuming it's somewhere in the FL190 to FL220 range?

Just trying to get a sense of both typical distances 1900s are used on, and cruising altitudes....heck anything else worth knowing too! I've been on some Dash-8-100s for various routes in the US that have stayed at or below 10,000 feet (flight times between 20 and 45 minutes), so....just curious.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:32 pm
by scon
Standard equipment across the entire fleet. Lack of autopilots is a weight issue. It was either that or the toilet.
Cruising levels anything from 8k to 25k.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:42 pm
by Ian Warren
scon wrote:
QUOTE (scon @ Jan 9 2014,3:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It was either that or the toilet.

Oh Shite ... well someone had to say it biggrin.gif

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:19 pm
by Dash8captain
SeanTK wrote:
QUOTE (SeanTK @ Jan 9 2014,3:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow, surprised to learn that you guys don't have autopilots in your 1900s! Is that across the whole fleet, or do some planes have varying equipment?

Also, what are your typical cruising altitudes for various route lengths? I know the ceiling is listed as FL250, so I'm assuming it's somewhere in the FL190 to FL220 range?

Just trying to get a sense of both typical distances 1900s are used on, and cruising altitudes....heck anything else worth knowing too! I've been on some Dash-8-100s for various routes in the US that have stayed at or below 10,000 feet (flight times between 20 and 45 minutes), so....just curious.


According to an RNZAF King Air Pilot Air New Zealands Beech 1900Ds are some of the oldest in the world? maybe this is why they have no AP?

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:51 pm
by jimmyconway
Dash8captain wrote:
QUOTE (Dash8captain @ Jan 9 2014,6:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
According to an RNZAF King Air Pilot Air New Zealands Beech 1900Ds are some of the oldest in the world? maybe this is why they have no AP?


I thought they were the last off the production line?

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:25 pm
by Naki
They are

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 6:52 am
by Lindstrim
I thought that it was a cost thing rather than a weight issue?

EAP is the last one off the line

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:16 am
by Ian Warren
Lindstrim wrote:
QUOTE (Lindstrim @ Jan 10 2014,7:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I thought that it was a cost thing rather than a weight issue?

Welcome aboard 'Lindstrim' Yeah! bloody hell why pay the pilots if they are to just sit there twiddling their and enjoy the view , get em to work for a living tongue.gif

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:19 am
by hasegawa
Interesting... Today Iam 50 and still learning... biggrin.gif

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:08 pm
by victor_alpha_charlie
It's a cost issue. Very few of Eagle's routes are longer than 1-1.5 hours and the B1900 is a very stable aircraft to fly so it's an unnecessary expense for Eagle. I'll be starting a new job shortly in Aus in the 1900, some of ours have no AP and there are some routes in excess of 2 hours that they fly - should be interesting!

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:32 pm
by Ian Warren
And you forgot to say Tom , its a lot more fun hands on , what its all about !

PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:28 pm
by scon
Cost and weight. As VAC said why take the penalty when the sector length is so short.
Not sure where the airforce guys are getting there info from. Age wouldn't have anything to do with it, plenty of 80's KingAirs around with AP's. And, yes, Eagle's are the last of the production line, finishing with P. Q and R are second hand with no toilet and no AP.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:14 pm
by ardypilot
My understanding was the need for the Eagle 1900's to have a toilet on board was a Star Alliance requirement?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 1:30 pm
by Ian Warren
Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Jan 13 2014,2:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
a Star Alliance requirement?

Oh cr@p ! can't people hang on ... STINK ! biggrin.gif