Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:07 amNot that much different - the Kangaroo has been changed slightly see article here
not a bad design i wounder what brain box came up with that ,would of been hard work for them Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:07 amPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:17 amOh look a more aerodynamic SKIPPY not a bad design i wounder what brain box came up with that ,would of been hard work for them
not a bad design i wounder what brain box came up with that ,would of been hard work for them Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:36 amThe new one looks alright, but I still think they should put wings on it again.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:15 pmmmm doesn't look to bad does it, I think Mikes got it, more aerodynamic.
When will this be on their entire fleet, including OGM?
James
When will this be on their entire fleet, including OGM?
James
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:24 pmhttp://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/07/24/....html?from=top5 <- shows it quite well
I'd say a year for a full fleet roll out
I'd say a year for a full fleet roll out
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:24 pmI think it looks cr@p , I loved the old logo, this one looks like an evil Skippy
and that second link makes it looks cheep and nasty
and that second link makes it looks cheep and nasty
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:35 pmI think they should go retro and bring out the old 747sp liveries that'd look great
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:39 pmIs that pink i see on the tail?
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:01 pmcreator2003 wrote:QUOTE(creator2003 @ Jul 28 2007, 11:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Oh look a more aerodynamic SKIPPY
Yeah ...going to make the plane go Boing ....Boing ....Boing ....Boing ....Boing ....Boing ....Boing ....Boing ....Boing ....
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:41 pmthat second link makes it looks cheep and nasty
I agree with you Scon- when compared, the new one looks like a cheap chinise rip off. The new font writing especially looks rubbish!
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:45 pmNot sure I like the new font either...
Also, am I the only one that thinks the new logo has a touch of "Maori Carving"-ness to it??
Also, am I the only one that thinks the new logo has a touch of "Maori Carving"-ness to it??
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:52 pmjust heard onthe news, that the new logo has been scraped
edit: or not..
edit: or not..
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:37 pmThis is just one big publicity stunt, this is barely a change at all, I know that it will be forever a classic livery but, i am bored of it, I was really expecting a move away from euro white.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:46 pmOne airline logo i LOVE is Impulse ( went under 
and jestar bought the planes.. )
http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=0144...;next_id=NEXTID
and jestar bought the planes.. )http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=0144...;next_id=NEXTID
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:56 am10 points for the person who can tell me the 'real' reason why the logo was changed...
HINT: its actually a fairly stupid reason... but well that's just the typical french being difficult
HINT: its actually a fairly stupid reason... but well that's just the typical french being difficult
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:27 pmTail proportions of the A380 or something I think?
Alex
Alex
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:54 pmThis pic shows both of em in comparison too 
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:10 pmLooks a bit more like a wallaby than a kangaroo really, at least when compared to the old tail - thats what I think.
Alex
Alex
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:43 pmZK-Brock wrote:QUOTE(ZK-Brock @ Jul 25 2007, 07:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>This pic shows both of em in comparison too
It dosn't look so bad in real life, actually the tail in the front looks like quite a nice improvement.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:24 amAlex wrote:QUOTE(Alex @ Jul 25 2007, 07:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Tail proportions of the A380 or something I think?
Alex
ding ding ding... we have a winner...
Apparently its because the old logo would not fit on the A380 properly... hahahaah ridiculous