I am afraid that Happy Traveler is very misinformed. What happened yesterday was a malfunction parachute on an experienced cameraman’s jump. It was his first malfunction in 10 years. Malfunction parachutes are part of skydiving as much as a flat tyre is a part of driving. Skydivers notice the problem, disconnect and open their reserve. Then Simon landed on the airfield as normal. His main chute did land in a paddock and was retrieved – we have no control over where the parachute lands but we do have radio contact with other airport users. What appears to be extremely sad about this incident today was that whoever took photos tried to sell them to a newspaper – 2 newspapers called me and asked for the storey. This person did not check with us for details on the incident or to see if there was anyone hurt or what the procedure was – they took it off their own back to e-mail the media to try and make up a story and obtain money. Sad, almost sick I would say. This type of alarmist and misinformed behaviour can affect a business and the livlihood of many people who have spent most of their life working 7 days a week.
So as you know we are deeply proud and protective of our 100% safety record here at Skydive Lake Wanaka, we have as you say NEVER had a conflict in 12 years with other airport users and our Pilots have 10,000 flying hours between them. Our investment of over $1.5 million on our aircraft alone has come about form 12 years or hard work and dedication to our business and the sport of skydiving and it is despicable that someone who does not possess ANY facts of the incident today would post such a bad piece of uninformed writing and pictures.
Yes we did take off 15 minutes later – malfunctions are a part of skydiving and our cameramen dealt with the situation in a totally professional manner. This did NOT involve a tandem parachute, there was nothing wrong with Simons equipment, high performance canopies sometimes malfunction for no reason which is why we carry a complete back up device. What this plane spotter saw was just the main parachute floating down. It is such a shame that he did not show his face and call in at the drop zone to check his facts, ensure that no one was actually hurt before writing a lot of mis informed jargon.
Today is a sad day reading this blog, and it was a complete waste of a lot of peoples time to have to talk with both the ODT and the Press who both declined to pay the photographer any money for a storey about nothing.
We invite Happy Traveler to our drop zone to and come and see how we run our operation and talk through some of the real facts about skydiving so next time they do not jump to their own conclusions about malfunctions or down wind landings.
QUOTE
Breaking News!!
I was out at Wanaka airport to photo the AirNZ flight, and was watching the skydivers whilst I was waiting. Saw a skydiver come down, and then noticed what appeared to be a streamer also coming down. I thought that they must have dropped something. Then I noticed that they were falling much more than the others, then noticed what looks like a canopy floating down, this later came down in the fields behind Wanaka airport. Saw the Skydive Wanaka van quickly going up the hill, presumably to retrieve the two parts.
*img snipped*
What was amazing that within 15 minutes, they were taking off again with more skydivers. If that had been me, then I would have checked all the chutes throughly before going again.
I am trying to get more details now.
Another safety concern that I have about Skydive Wanaka is their habit of landing downwind, when all other aircraft are using the into wind direction. Not only that, but they do a very small circuit so tend to cut in with a curving final approach. Given that there are a lot of helicopters and aircraft flying (including perhaps some non-radio) then it looks like an accident waiting to happen.
Watch this space, as they say!!
Smooth landings.[/quote]

Posted:
Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:50 am
by Charl
Jools thanks for posting here, and welcome.
What's your comment on the downwind landing aspect?

Posted:
Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:10 am
by Q300
Thanks for the info guys,
Helped me understand that it isnt at all "doggy" as I posted earler!
Sam

Posted:
Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:51 am
by A185F
Well I would have posted earlier but as weird coincidences would have it, I was out searching for a canopy this morn as a result of a malfunction last night (totally seperate place) so it does happen but quite rare. Only happens once in a very blue moon. With regard to down wind landings, there is no rule which states "thou shalt always land into wind". I havent landed into wind in YOUNKS but thats prob cos the rwy dosn't allow for it. What people should understand is that normal flying practices outside flight training (which is what most people here would be familiar with) can be and usually are very different to those associated with flight training, especially in busy working enviroments like skydive opps. Tailwind landings, curved approaches, lots of stuff usually frowned appon by instructors and aeroclubs etc is in fact quite common practice elsewhere. Just because there is no ATC doesnt mean that there is no radio contact. The jump plane and the local operators will all work in with each other so he can land on the other rwy so can taxi back and load the next lot on and back up as quick as pos.

Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:14 pm
by happytraveller
More on the incident at Wanaka.
I see that Jools27 did not reply to the question about downwind landings at Wanaka. The fact is that landing against the normal traffic pattern is dangerous, and is also against the procedures laid down in the NZ AIP. These clearly state that ALL AIRCRAFT shall land to conform with normal traffic procedures. No exception is made for Skydive Wanaka. Their operating practice of landing downwind is dangerous. I have already contacted the CAA about this, as it is a safety issue.
To quote Jools27 "Malfunction parachutes are part of skydiving as much as a flat tyre is a part of driving". I think that a malfunctioning parachute is rather more serious than a flat tyre on a car. I would prefer a flat tyre. I can understand that Skydive Wanaka want to avoid publicity over this matter.
There are too many accidents in NZ, so safety should be the highest priority.
Smooth landings (into wind).
(if anybody wants to check then the sections of the AIP are AD2- 51.1, especially rule 7)

Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:10 pm
by A185F
I have a feeling that you are digging yourself a large hole, if I were you mate I would quit the digging while you can
Piece out


Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:23 pm
by Matthew
A185F wrote:I have a feeling that you are digging yourself a large hole, if I were you mate I would quit the digging while you can
Piece out
I agree


Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:25 pm
by Q300
I have seen many planes land into the wind,
As for Wanaka as long as proper radio contact is made between skydive pilots and other GA and Eagle traffic then its not an issue.
My guess is the skydive pilots fly into the wind to help them slow up hence being empty and very light after dropping there 'cargo'...

Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:40 pm
by ZK-Brock
Q300 wrote:I have seen many planes land into the wind,
As for Wanaka as long as proper radio contact is made between skydive pilots and other GA and Eagle traffic then its not an issue.
My guess is the skydive pilots fly into the wind to help them slow up hence being empty and very light after dropping there 'cargo'...
I think you may be confused, the idea with landing aeroplanes is that you DO land into wind, so your groundspeed is lessened, making your ground roll shorter.
Anyway, you're best off out of it happytraveller. There's no safety issue.

Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:49 pm
by FlyingKiwi
Agreed with the above posts. It's not uncommon at all for skydiving aircraft to be operating out of the wind. Skydive Wanaka are not unique in this, and nor is it at all dangerous as long as proper radio contact is kept with other aircraft. Steep curving approaches are also quite normal for skydiving operations - if you've ever been to Taupo airport you'll see this very often. It's a non-event as far as I can see, and unless you want to start a witchhunt against all skydiving operators, then singling out Skydive Wanaka seems rather unfair.

Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:15 pm
by Q300
ZK-Brock wrote:I think you may be confused, the idea with landing aeroplanes is that you DO land into wind, so your groundspeed is lessened, making your ground roll shorter.
Anyway, you're best off out of it happytraveller. There's no safety issue.
Ahh damb it yea I was just a tad confused there
What I was trying to get through was Skydive planes land with the wind!
Sory for the mix up


Posted:
Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:51 pm
by squirrel350
Very interesting reading in this little debate as some one stated if one has been to NZAP you will see that it is common practice I have watched many of the jump-ships landing and taking off and have never seen anything dangerous come about as long as there is constant communication between air-space users there shouldn't be any problems.
My 2 cents.
SQ350