Heat shimmer and flames.....

Big wheels.....

100% ad-free
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Jul 7 2011,10:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I've often wondered if it might extend that a lot if you were to spin them up before landing.
A simple wind-driven turbine hub might do.
Funny you should say that ... I've often thought exactly the same thing! Hitting a fairly abrasive surface at 150mph can't be good.
I do remember going on a domestic flight in Poland once - it was a big fixed undercarriage thing - and staring at the wheel outside my window ... it was *totally bald*!!!
AndrewJamez wrote:QUOTE (AndrewJamez @ Jul 8 2011,3:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The damn busting Lancs had spinning bombs. They just covered the top half of the cylinder with a shroud and the bottom half was exposed to the airflow which lept it spinning giving the bomb much better bounce so to speak.
So they didn't actually spin them up mechanically beforehand? Clever!!
AndrewJamez wrote:QUOTE (AndrewJamez @ Jul 8 2011,3:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The damn busting Lancs had spinning bombs. They just covered the top half of the cylinder with a shroud and the bottom half was exposed to the airflow which lept it spinning giving the bomb much better bounce so to speak.
The very early prototypes yes, later and operational versions, no.
Upkeep's (type 464) that were used during "Operation Chastise" were belt driven from hydraulic motors to give a reverse spin to the device.Regards always
Pete
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests