Page 1 of 2

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:05 pm
by omitchell

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:23 pm
by Peppermint
Ahhhh! If only I had room for something like that, and nieces and nephews who knew not to touch and play with models

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:47 pm
by omitchell
Peppermint wrote:
QUOTE (Peppermint @ Aug 27 2014,9:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ahhhh! If only I had room for something like that, and nieces and nephews who knew not to touch and play with models


One is easily solved, just involves legal complications smile.gif

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:22 pm
by cowpatz
omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Aug 27 2014,9:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
One is easily solved, just involves legal complications smile.gif



Long sleeves or short sleeves.......

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:27 pm
by Ian Warren
Amazing history with this ship , all that gold , dates to late 1600 hundreds when it was built , was at the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805 .. finial got destroyed by fire few years later, someone left a candled burning .... DOH!

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:36 am
by omitchell
Would make a nice project for those artistic people amongst us

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:19 am
by Sonnyj
omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Aug 28 2014,8:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Would make a nice project for those artistic people amongst us

Of course you fellas realize it will cost you $2028.64 to complete this project! ohmy.gif

4.99 to start & 135 more issues at 14.99 to complete.

LOL

Cheers

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:36 am
by Ian Warren
I have thought of a radio controlled type with using 5/6 Ricard motors to winch different sail settings, a quick check - built in 1637 and accidentally destroyed by fire a Chatham in 1696.

Sonnyj wrote:
QUOTE (Sonnyj @ Aug 28 2014,10:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Of course you fellas realize it will cost you $2028.64 to complete this project! ohmy.gif

4.99 to start & 135 more issues at 14.99 to complete.

LOL

Cheers

They did a model of the Bismark along the same lines .. I prefect to go scratch built

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:13 am
by Sonnyj
Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Aug 28 2014,9:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have thought of a radio controlled type with using 5/6 Ricard motors to winch different sail settings, a quick check - built in 1637 and accidentally destroyed by fire a Chatham in 1696.


They did a model of the Bismark along the same lines .. I prefect to go scratch built


Yeah but, didn't the Bismark sink??? unsure.gif

Oh maybe the sovereign did as well.. Twins.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:31 am
by Ian Warren
The Bismark was sunk by gunfire from the below ... Sovereign of the Sea's by candle light fire .... dinner maybe ?

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:04 am
by Sonnyj
The Bismark was sunk by gunfire from the below ... Sovereign of the Sea's by candle light fire .... dinner maybe ?
I dunno, Ian, I just get that sinking feeling when I think of them

Love to have a museum of my own with all this stuff. Maybe the I could call it the 'smithsonian'

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:18 am
by Ian Warren
Sonnyj wrote:
QUOTE (Sonnyj @ Aug 28 2014,12:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Love to have a museum of my own with all this stuff. Maybe the I could call it the 'smithsonian'

Strangely I did have a large fleet but nice peoples could not steal or sell them so they jumped on them and destroyed the many, this was the stage I thought of a "Ship of the Line" like the 'Sovereign of the Sea's' but lessor .. away from all that gold.

'Smithsonian' maybe close ... If I did have all I would have brought a bigger place.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:19 pm
by omitchell
Sonnyj wrote:
QUOTE (Sonnyj @ Aug 28 2014,10:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah but, didn't the Bismark sink??? unsure.gif

Oh maybe the sovereign did as well.. Twins.


So did the Titanic but both had assistance in that feat smile.gif

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 2:41 pm
by Ian Warren
Fire and Ice, and the pomp of the period, it is amazing the study of these type off ship the sail i mean, they did have plan's for them but were change during the build simply because the tree was a different shape ... was not till the later style China Tea clippers come out they had an almost example design , makes the old 1600/1700 century ship so unique.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 6:10 pm
by lowglow
It'll be like all the other books that have come out with bits to build something you'll get it half finished and they will stop the books. I've done this before twice half built models and, Oh sorry but were not continuing on with these anymore.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 7:07 pm
by Ian Warren
lowglow wrote:
QUOTE (lowglow @ Aug 28 2014,7:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It'll be like all the other books that have come out with bits to build something you'll get it half finished and they will stop the books. I've done this before twice half built models and, Oh sorry but were not continuing on with these anymore.

Now that would really whined me up, have been there with a series off books, I'll stick with my scratch builds, as you know Chris, your like me .. follow the research and build from there.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:08 pm
by omitchell
lowglow wrote:
QUOTE (lowglow @ Aug 28 2014,6:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It'll be like all the other books that have come out with bits to build something you'll get it half finished and they will stop the books. I've done this before twice half built models and, Oh sorry but were not continuing on with these anymore.


I've finished all the ones I started.. smile.gif I think I have some form of OCD, I HAVE to finish something, I can't ever leave it half done...

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 8:24 pm
by Ian Warren
omitchell wrote:
QUOTE (omitchell @ Aug 28 2014,9:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I've finished all the ones I started.. smile.gif I think I have some form of OCD, I HAVE to finish something, I can't ever leave it half done...

Doubt be a magazine project , mind you if I had the base I would complete it ... biggest thing , the entire costing as Les measure and priced , Id want the complete kit.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:33 pm
by emfrat
And of course 'Bismarck' sank HMS Hood...my late Dad was born in 1913, and a couple of days after he started school - 1918 - he saw HMS Hood being launched from John Brown's yard in Clydebank. The shipyard was barely 250m from the school, and when I was at the same school in the mid/late 1950s we could hear the riveting guns going all day. In 1941, Dad was on duty in Portsmouth Barracks when the news came through that 'Hood' had been sunk. This only came to light when niece Kate did a school project to ask the old'uns what school was like in their day. The casual aside in Dad's response enabled us to pinpoint the date he actually started school...
The 'Net can do great things like this - it is a tragedy that something like 80% of the content is wasted on porn.

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:52 pm
by Ian Warren
emfrat wrote:
QUOTE (emfrat @ Aug 28 2014,10:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And of course 'Bismarck' sank HMS Hood...my late Dad was born in 1913, and a couple of days after he started school - 1918 - he saw HMS Hood being launched from John Brown's yard in Clydebank. The shipyard was barely 250m from the school, and when I was at the same school in the mid/late 1950s we could hear the riveting guns going all day. In 1941, Dad was on duty in Portsmouth Barracks when the news came through that 'Hood' had been sunk. This only came to light when niece Kate did a school project to ask the old'uns what school was like in their day. The casual aside in Dad's response enabled us to pinpoint the date he actually started school...

Amazing Warship the Hood but very lacking, Mike, pleased you post your history, for some reason I study the class's and how they changed between the wars, as you well no when HMS Hood blew up is was in concert with the Price of Wales, ... course the photo is off the class the KGV , .. pleased there is interest and people wonder and ask questions.