NZFF

Posted: **Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:02 pm**

Just read the paper and saw an article on this. Which would you like to see in place?

I suppose I'd personally prefer knighthoods, but doesn't really affect me ... yet.

Alex

Posted: **Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:55 pm**

Knighthoods all the way - such a time honoured tradition, steeped in history and widely recognized around the world. The NZ equivalent does not cut it for me - thanks Aunty Helen !!

Posted: **Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:04 pm**

Don't care

They're both pretty prestigious, and if you've done something great enough to deserve one, what it's called will be the least of your worries.

Posted: **Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:53 am**

Knighthoods are better as they are recognised internationally a new honours system would take a while for people overseas to recognise.

Posted: **Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:57 am**

Kinghthoods by far, not the silly system brought in by Uncle Helen!

Posted: **Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:53 am**

I preferred the Knighthoods system, like Deane said they are much more internationally recognised.

NZFF

Knighthoods or new 'Honours' system?