NZ B747-200 in LAX

Post and comment on screen captures from the beautiful game here. Home of the monthly screenshot competition

Postby Court Line flyer » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:11 am

ZK-NZV arriving in LAX in the late afternoon.






Karl
Court Line Flyer (UK)
Last edited by Court Line flyer on Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Court Line Flyer
Image
Court Line flyer
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:38 am
Posts: 22
Location: Essex, UK

Postby benwynn » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:24 am

Very Nice! Love that Cloud Nine Scenery, really must get around to buying it!
User avatar
benwynn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 1433
Location: YBBN

Postby Daniel » Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:43 pm

Cool Pics Karl :thumbup:
Is this FS 2004?
Keep them coming B-)

Cheers
Daniel
Daniel
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:42 pm
Posts: 946
Location: New Zealand

Postby ardypilot » Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:52 pm

That would be the 747-400, not -200 wouldn't it? Project Opensky v4 model I presume- one of my favourite freeware heavies :thumbup:
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby NZ255 » Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:05 pm

Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Apr 8 2008, 05:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That would be the 747-400, not -200 wouldn't it? Project Opensky v4 model I presume- one of my favourite freeware heavies :thumbup:

Not -400 -no winglets, if if not a 200, its probably a 300
Nick
User avatar
NZ255
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2475

Postby Stumpy » Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:07 pm

Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Apr 8 2008, 06:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That would be the 747-400, not -200 wouldn't it? Project Opensky v4 model I presume- one of my favourite freeware heavies :thumbup:


Most definately not -200. Look closely at the "bump". A lot smaller than -400
Stumpy
 

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:23 pm

It is most definitely a -200. Short 'hump' + no winglets= -200.
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby greaneyr » Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:57 pm

The -200s have different looking engines too. The back of the engines on the ANZ -400 protrude a lot further than those do. That's definitely a -200. It's confusing people since it's in the latest livery. I'm not sure how long our -200s wore that livery. I know the -400s wore the previous one.
User avatar
greaneyr
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:53 pm
Posts: 459
Location: Palmerston North

Postby brownbox » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:13 pm

definately -200
Desktop:Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8@ 3.0Ghz@ 1.36v. 4Gb Supertalent DDR2-800 2.1v@ 5-5-5-15. Asus P5N-E SLI Pencil Modded. Corsair TX 650. 512MB Palit Geforce 8800GT. 2x200GB IDE+640GB SATAII. Windows Vista Ultimate X86. Samsung SH-S222A
Phone:Nokia N900 Vodafone
Car: 1993 Mitsubishi Mirage Asti Z. Steel Blue Pearl

1996 Toyota Curren 2.0L 5 Spd Manual Silver. 205/50/R16 on Enkei K-95. Lowered on Jamex Superlows. Remote locking. Remote boot release. Cruise control
1996 Mitsubishi GTO MR

Image
User avatar
brownbox
Senior Member
 
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:55 pm
Posts: 1318

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:19 pm

greaneyr wrote:
QUOTE (greaneyr @ Apr 8 2008, 07:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The -200s have different looking engines too. The back of the engines on the ANZ -400 protrude a lot further than those do. That's definitely a -200. It's confusing people since it's in the latest livery. I'm not sure how long our -200s wore that livery. I know the -400s wore the previous one.


It actually depends what type of engine they have. The engines on this one (RR's), look short and fat, but the PW engines are longer/thinner.
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby ardypilot » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:20 pm

QUOTE
It is most definitely a -200. Short 'hump' + no winglets= -200.[/quote]
:whoops: Whoops, my bad! I did actually know this, but looked straight at the repaint on the model and automatically thought POSKY! What FS aircraft designer made that variant Court Line flyer?

After searching ZK-NZV on A.net, you are right in the fact it was a 747-219B (cn 22722/523), sold on to Virgin Atlantic Airways in 1999, and then Transaero Airlines in 2006.
Last edited by ardypilot on Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby greaneyr » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:25 pm

victor_alpha_charlie wrote:
QUOTE (victor_alpha_charlie @ Apr 8 2008, 08:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It actually depends what type of engine they have.

Yeah, like I said 'the back of the engines on the ANZ -400s protrude a lot further than those do'. Those are the RB-211s that our -200s had.
User avatar
greaneyr
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:53 pm
Posts: 459
Location: Palmerston North

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:34 pm

greaneyr wrote:
QUOTE (greaneyr @ Apr 8 2008, 08:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Yeah, like I said 'the back of the engines on the ANZ -400s protrude a lot further than those do'. Those are the RB-211s that our -200s had.



Whoops, missed that. Early morning this morning :D
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby Daniel » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:45 pm

What does the title say? :P NZ B747-200 in LAX :D

Cheers
Daniel
Daniel
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:42 pm
Posts: 946
Location: New Zealand

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:55 pm

Daniel wrote:
QUOTE (Daniel @ Apr 8 2008, 08:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What does the title say? :P NZ B747-200 in LAX :D

Cheers
Daniel


Hey, I said it was a 742 all along.. :P
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby Court Line flyer » Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:17 am

It is all POSKY work - I can't take much credit other than for modifying the -400 livery to fit the -200. It's not quite perfect as I think I need to remove those red blocks from the engines, and I'm missing the "-200" from the "Boeing 747" by the rear doors. Other than that I'm chuffed with the result - I just love the NZ livery - shame to see the Pacific Wave missing from some aircraft in service. Can't see why it needs updating though I hear on the grapevine that the change is on hold for a while.

Am working on putting the current livery on the DC-10...for which the purists will no doubt hate me! Pics to follow.

Karl
Court Line Flyer
Image
Court Line flyer
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:38 am
Posts: 22
Location: Essex, UK

Postby Anthony » Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:05 pm

POSKY's stuff is actually quite nice I must say.
I have lots of their stuff because mainly its free, and because its pretty good.

Nice shots.

Cheers
Anthony
Image
User avatar
Anthony
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:07 pm
Posts: 947
Location: Rotorua

Postby benwynn » Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:36 am

Shame Posky's FDE are really really bad!
User avatar
benwynn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 1433
Location: YBBN

Postby Peppermint » Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:09 pm

Looks like they released a new FDE for their 744v4 and fixed the taxi issue, haven't got around to try it yet. It is a shame their FDEs are designed like they are, I think I read somewhere they made it so a full joystick movement to the left or right would only be equal to about 40% than the real world, they made it like that because of some stupid reason. Something about us flying them like fighter jets, pulling the joystick all the way to the left to start a turn etc etc. Kind of makes you think that POSKY think they're the only people who like to fly as real as possible.

But oh well.

The pics are nice, does look a lot like a 744 if you don't look at the engines, maybe a little too 'clean'?
Peppermint
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 516
Location: Christchurch


Return to Screenshots

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests