IFly 737 NG

[Ian Warren]

QUOTE (connor @ Jun 6 2011,7:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Phew, I thought my encyclopedia of aerospace knowledge was slipping!

Connor your Knowledge is slipping

[connor]

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 6 2011,7:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Connor your Knowledge is slipping

Scary, my memory's going, and I'm only 14! I'll be in a rest home before I'm 20!

[Ian Warren]

QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jun 6 2011,8:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Hey hey....come on kids, this is a screenshot thread , no arguments please.

No arguments , this is a defining schoolyard sand pit fight off the who 'nos' what sand fight , and there is no sand in my eyes yet !

[deeknow]

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 6 2011,8:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

No arguments , this is a defining schoolyard sand pit fight off the who 'nos' what sand fight , and there is no sand in my eyes yet !

Hehe.. stick to the warbirds Ian .. straight from the horses mouth following, classic series are 3/4/500s
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/1999/n...se_991209a.html

[Ian Warren]

Dean , I still disagree
The aeroplane rolled out today is actually the 3,132nd Boeing 737 in the "first generation" and Classic series. That total includes 30 737-100s, 1,114 737-200s, 1,113 737-300s, 486 737-400s and 389 737-500s.
First Generation is the Classic 100/200 .. 3/4/500 series were original 'New Generation' in 1985 then - and today now the later 'Next Generation ' NG series ... Media really muck's up some times as promos , it has simply been resold as a market ploy but the classic was still the 200 series .

[deeknow]

Yeah I agree it's no doubt a marketing muddle, but sadly thats what the 300-500 series is referred as, the Classics, I agrre with you though it makes more sense for the 100-200s