Sydney --> Singapore --> Dubai --> Heathrow

[ScottyB]

I recently bought the Level D 767 and wow, what a machine. I actually like it more than the Captain Sim 767 for some reason.

Here is a massive long haul flight I have been doing over the last couple of days.

Enjoy

Oh no, just tried to upload photos and have seemed to have lost most of them So only have from Sydney --> Singapore.

[ZK-MAT]

Bad news Scotty ... they are still awol. Unless it was snowing??

Edit: Ahhh there they are. Nice pics mate

[Adamski]

QUOTE (ScottyB @ Apr 29 2010, 04:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I recently bought the Level D 767 and wow, what a machine. I actually like it more than the Captain Sim 767 for some reason.

Nice pics! I have the CS B767 and have to do loads of hours in it for my next stage on vANZ, so I'd be keen to know their relative strengths/weaknesses. Any real difference in functionality?

[deeknow]

Like the screenies Scotty. I'd also like your salary, or at least be able to afford to buy two commercial 767s
ps - was that a fog in Singapore? is that common there does anyone know?

[ScottyB]

QUOTE (Adamski @ Apr 29 2010, 06:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Nice pics! I have the CS B767 and have to do loads of hours in it for my next stage on vANZ, so I'd be keen to know their relative strengths/weaknesses. Any real difference in functionality?

I like the Level D because it is more of a true simulator. The CS model is not so realistic in terms of systems etc, however the graphics are maybe a tiny bit better. Although I think the Level D's graphics are very close to the CS anyway.



Smooth landings mate.

QUOTE (deeknow @ Apr 29 2010, 08:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Like the screenies Scotty. I'd also like your salary, or at least be able to afford to buy two commercial 767s
ps - was that a fog in Singapore? is that common there does anyone know?

I am a high school student...so no salary I just save. Haha.

It was more rain, and the fog seemed to be more smog from the city, if that makes sense.

[ScottyB]

[Ian Warren]

One thing i find with the LD767 is the sound set is the better off the two , and maybe the flight dynamics - this , when i first flew this model , the thing i found was it was a real slippery customer on approach , required planning a lot more than the early PMDG for FS9 , again had to get it for FSX , ... but i need to now how our Russian friends were going to come up different to beat it , so i brought that as well to compare .... hey, Dean I left school decades back ! last century ... Scotty , I can see you score many hours in this one

[deeknow]

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Apr 30 2010, 01:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

but i need to now how our Russian friends were going to come up different to beat it , so i brought that as well to compare

Ahh.. .why does that not surprise me? Ian-long-pockets-Warren!!

[happytraveller]

Some great night shots there, always hard to get a good night shot, but well done! Nice moon too.

The standard of screenshots just keeps getting better and better. Nice looking LAN Chile repaint too.

Only problem that I found with the ultra real airliner models is that it takes me about 45 minutes to program and start the things, then the time for simming is up.

Smooth landings.

[Ian Warren]

QUOTE (deeknow @ Apr 30 2010, 08:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Ahh.. .why does that not surprise me? Ian-long-pockets-Warren!!

Only for the best flight simulation company,s or must have been brain washed by an old TV advert ...... LETS BUY IT !