NZFF

Welcome back.......very nice screens love the F-15........keep them coming..........


Marty

Splitpin wrote:

QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jul 4 2010, 11:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Welcome back.......very nice screens love the F-15........keep them coming..........


Marty

Thank you

The F-15 shots were done with the Iris F-15E package and Blue Sky Scenery's Utah photoreal set.

The Shadow is back , I do like the F15 , Photoreal scenery by Gottfried Razek ?

Ian Warren wrote:

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 4 2010, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The Shadow is back , I do like the F15 , Photoreal scenery by Gottfried Razek ?

Shadow ......or Ian......are your screens from FS9?....

@ Marty Most all photoreal by Gottfried Razek are FS9 , they do work in FSX , most areas are 100MB size .. If an area or any ever needed AGNs .. oh boy !

Ian Warren wrote:

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 5 2010, 12:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The Shadow is back , I do like the F15 , Photoreal scenery by Gottfried Razek ?

Gottfried would be the one
Shame he doesn't put some NZ stuff out.
Splitpin, my shots are done in FS9.

F-15C dusk landing at Ohakea runway 15:

ShadowMystDK wrote:

QUOTE (ShadowMystDK @ Jul 5 2010, 12:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Shame he doesn't put some NZ stuff out.

Simple , He could mot handle our persistence in making it it REAL , So with that we have done far better , Autogened and photo .... 'FS9' yip you just have to look for it .

Who the hell was VOZ .... .... Ok Orbx ,

FSX .. VLC , there still is plenty for FS9 But the next generation off scenery is to arrive

Ian Warren wrote:

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 5 2010, 12:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Simple , He could mot handle our persistence in making it it REAL , So with that we have done far better , Autogened and photo .... 'FS9' yip you just have to look for it .

Who the hell was VOZ .... .... Ok Orbx ,

FSX .. VLC , there still is plenty for FS9 But the next generation off scenery is to arrive

Yes boss ........Im trying to catch up.......should'nt you be in bed now Ian?.......

Ian Warren wrote:

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 5 2010, 01:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Simple , He could mot handle our persistence in making it it REAL , So with that we have done far better , Autogened and photo .... 'FS9' yip you just have to look for it .

Who the hell was VOZ .... .... Ok Orbx ,

FSX .. VLC , there still is plenty for FS9 But the next generation off scenery is to arrive

I will admit, Blue Sky's strong point isn't autogen - the LAX scenery is a good example. If you're right up on the LAX financial district there's lots of it - but from more than a couple miles away 80% of it disappears. I much prefer areas like Utah and Colorado for his stuff.

FS9 does have a huge library of aircraft to tinker with...



Love those 4th-gen fighters - these are Coral F-15 payware
The Mudhen is still top of my list of jets that mean business, think Iris is about the only one available?

Somehow, the F-35 doesn't do it for me...shocking to think that it will become the sole mount of most Western AF's

Charl wrote:

QUOTE (Charl @ Jul 5 2010, 09:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

FS9 does have a huge library of aircraft to tinker with...

Love those 4th-gen fighters - these are Coral F-15 payware
The Mudhen is still top of my list of jets that mean business, think Iris is about the only one available?

Somehow, the F-35 doesn't do it for me...shocking to think that it will become the sole mount of most Western AF's

A lot of folks had the same doubts about the F-16 as it was first entering service - the thought was that a pure dayfighter with air-to-mud ability wasn't going to last long in a world filled with radar guided missile shooting opponents. Now we know what an outstanding jet it turned out to be.

ShadowMystDK wrote:

QUOTE (ShadowMystDK @ Jul 5 2010, 09:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

A lot of folks had the same doubts about the F-16 as it was first entering service - the thought was that a pure dayfighter with air-to-mud ability wasn't going to last long in a world filled with radar guided missile shooting opponents. Now we know what an outstanding jet it turned out to be.

The opposite with F-35 though...the thought is that it is too much air to mud and not enough for air to air (agility etc).