Kaitaia to the Cape

Post and comment on screen captures from the beautiful game here. Home of the monthly screenshot competition

Postby Olderndirt » Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:12 pm

Got this super-deluxe amphib Cub and want to see the 'John o'Groats' of New Zealand.

Off Kaitaia headed northwest.



Along the ninety mile beach.



Looking back at Great Exhibition Bay.



North Cape, reputedly the most northerly point of New Zealand.

Last edited by Olderndirt on Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Olderndirt
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1774
Location: Rochester, Washington USA

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:17 pm

You can really tell photo-real when displayed but due to limitations we miss many other area s , thanks for VLC , ... now ya shore you not a Kiwi unsure.gif
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby AlisterC » Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:42 pm

man I'm a kiwi and I've never flown around the north of the north like that.. overhead at 35000 not counted. Nice pics, must try that flight sometime.
Image
User avatar
AlisterC
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:13 am
Posts: 2543
Location: Nelson, NZ

Postby Adamski » Wed Apr 27, 2011 7:30 pm

Here Dave ... have you been getting cloud tutorials from Splitpin? laugh.gif

Great pics - they remind me of the summer we just had!
Image
User avatar
Adamski
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 5029
Location: Birkenhead, Auckland

Postby Olderndirt » Thu Apr 28, 2011 2:18 am

Adamski wrote:
QUOTE (Adamski @ Apr 27 2011,12:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Here Dave ... have you been getting cloud tutorials from Splitpin? laugh.gif

Great pics - they remind me of the summer we just had!
His version of REX and mine are from the same batch. After all the diddling around, trying to create a visually acceptable screenshot, having to reduce it to jpeg almost breaks my heart sad.gif .
Image
User avatar
Olderndirt
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1774
Location: Rochester, Washington USA

Postby Adamski » Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:20 pm

Olderndirt wrote:
QUOTE (Olderndirt @ Apr 28 2011,2:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
His version of REX and mine are from the same batch. After all the diddling around, trying to create a visually acceptable screenshot, having to reduce it to jpeg almost breaks my heart sad.gif .

I know what you mean sad.gif ... what compression settings are you saving them with? .. and ... are you converting to .jpg only as the very last operation?
Image
User avatar
Adamski
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 5029
Location: Birkenhead, Auckland

Postby Olderndirt » Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:59 pm

Adamski wrote:
QUOTE (Adamski @ Apr 27 2011,6:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I know what you mean sad.gif ... what compression settings are you saving them with? .. and ... are you converting to .jpg only as the very last operation?
Start out with .bmp from the 'V' and keep it there while I diddle with it. When I go to the almost final 'save as' it becomes JPEG. After that I run it through 'TOPAZ dejpeg' filter to see if I can clean it up which returns it to PSD. Once more back to JPEG and I'm done.
Last edited by Olderndirt on Thu Apr 28, 2011 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Olderndirt
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1774
Location: Rochester, Washington USA

Postby Adamski » Thu Apr 28, 2011 2:26 pm

Olderndirt wrote:
QUOTE (Olderndirt @ Apr 28 2011,1:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Start out with .bmp from the 'V' and keep it there while I diddle with it. When I go to the almost final 'save as' it becomes JPEG. After that I run it through 'TOPAZ dejpeg' filter to see if I can clean it up which returns it to PSD. Once more back to JPEG and I'm done.

I'm wondering whether that final .psd > .jpg step is re-introducing JPEG artefacts <?>. What's your main GFX program? I use Photoshop and find the .jpg export function quite good.
Image
User avatar
Adamski
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 5029
Location: Birkenhead, Auckland

Postby Splitpin » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:13 pm

Beautiful shots Dave thumbup1.gif thumbup1.gif Book yourself a holiday down here , and have a look at the real thing....plenty of us here to look after you.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21333
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Adamski » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:20 pm

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Apr 28 2011,8:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Book yourself a holiday down here , and have a look at the real thing....plenty of us here to look after you.

whathesaid.gif

Plenty of people North *and* South, I suspect. I volunteer for the AKL area! We could do NZAA, NZAR, NZWP, NZNE ... maybe even Coromandel and Waiheke! Sadly all by car, I'm afraid ... unless you want to bring your aircraft with you laugh.gif
Last edited by Adamski on Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Adamski
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 5029
Location: Birkenhead, Auckland

Postby Olderndirt » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:22 am

Adamski wrote:
QUOTE (Adamski @ Apr 27 2011,7:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm wondering whether that final .psd > .jpg step is re-introducing JPEG artefacts <?>. What's your main GFX program? I use Photoshop and find the .jpg export function quite good.
This TOPAZ thing is supposed to help remove artifacts and other baddies. It has preview settings to show what you have and what you'll get. When I zoom, it all looks pretty clean but I know each jpeg save you lose a little. I inherited Photoshop Elements 7 from the wife - has most of the PS features. Normal routine is OPEN .bmp - CROP, ENHANCE etc .bmp - RESIZE .bmp, set pixelsperinch to 360 for 1024 width then bicubic sharper. - SAVE AS .jpeg then the TOPAZ DEJPEG and since it's a plugin it comes back as .PSD so it's once more SAVE AS jpeg. Ready for Photobucket.
Image
User avatar
Olderndirt
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1774
Location: Rochester, Washington USA

Postby Adamski » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:07 am

Olderndirt wrote:
QUOTE (Olderndirt @ Apr 29 2011,2:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This TOPAZ thing is supposed to help remove artifacts and other baddies. It has preview settings to show what you have and what you'll get. When I zoom, it all looks pretty clean but I know each jpeg save you lose a little. I inherited Photoshop Elements 7 from the wife - has most of the PS features. Normal routine is OPEN .bmp - CROP, ENHANCE etc .bmp - RESIZE .bmp, set pixelsperinch to 360 for 1024 width then bicubic sharper. - SAVE AS .jpeg then the TOPAZ DEJPEG and since it's a plugin it comes back as .PSD so it's once more SAVE AS jpeg. Ready for Photobucket.

Hmmm ... how do they look without the TOPAZ step?

You say "pixels per inch to 360" <?> ... I think you can safely leave this at 72 dpi. 300 or 360 is mainly for *print* resolution. Don't forget to set your colour profile to sRGB (or you'll find browsers remapping colours). That setting's usually in the "Save as" dialog.

I tend to use "bicubic (for smooth gradients)" when resizing, then applying any local or total image sharpening with the filter **immediately after the resize**. If you do it straight away, the filter works on the *original size* (which is still in the memory buffer) and does much better interpolation. Do a few edits and you'll lose that (larger) buffer and the sharpen won't be quite as good.

I save to .jpg at round 9-12 quality (rarely less than 9) and don't see any flattening of gradients or artefacts. If you can grab any of my images and open then in your Elements, see what info they carry over - then maybe re-save a few times with different filters/settings/+-TOPAZ and compare.

EDIT: Forgot to add ... my brother uses Elements (quite an early version) and it does seem to perform in a similar way to my PS CS5. He does a lot of photography and gets by quite well without all the fancy doodads of the full-blown Photoshop.
Last edited by Adamski on Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Adamski
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 5029
Location: Birkenhead, Auckland

Postby cowpatz » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:42 am

Where's the light house? smile.gif

There seems to be a lot of blue tone in your shots there Olderndirt....some almost appear as a water colour painting.
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Timmo » Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:59 am

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Apr 29 2011,9:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Where's the light house? smile.gif

There seems to be a lot of blue tone in your shots there Olderndirt....some almost appear as a water colour painting.


I actually removed them from the dataset at beta stage in VLC because the models in the default library aren't particularly NZ looking..... Modelling some typical NZ lighthouse designs could be a good project for someone to do in the future?
Timmo
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:28 pm
Posts: 2056
Location: Tauranga

Postby Olderndirt » Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:10 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Apr 28 2011,2:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Where's the light house? smile.gif

There seems to be a lot of blue tone in your shots there Olderndirt....some almost appear as a water colour painting.
Don't know nuthin' about no lighthouse. Must've been one of my 'blue' days. Sometimes I'm accused of being overly green - so far I don't think I've OD'd on red smile.gif .
Image
User avatar
Olderndirt
Senior Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1774
Location: Rochester, Washington USA


Return to Screenshots

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests