Page 1 of 2

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:37 pm
by Splitpin
Working up to a comp screen, but I'll throw these in here for now....

Dougs Buggy....



Electra



C-17



C-5M in the fog...







And in the clear...check out the wind sock ....this final was "final"....poor aircraft sad.gif






FSX, VLC, REX, Hamilton X, Area 51,Team KBT, Rick Piper, Adrian Brausch

PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 11:11 pm
by Ian Warren
Lovely Screens Marty cool.gif

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:31 pm
by ardypilot
That 2nd Galaxy shot in the fog is magic! clapping.gif

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:35 pm
by Splitpin
Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 6 2011,12:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Lovely Screens Marty cool.gif


Thanks Ian, i was just telling Mike that i did about 5 approaches in that C-5 ......even with almost 0 fuel and no payload it barely stopped . Im not sure how accurate the flight model is.

I sometimes have a guy stay here , who flew "Fred" (C-5) out of Dover, he was saying that they can fly an approach as low as 100kts, and up to about 175, and roll out in about 4,000ft...payload dependent.

36R at hamilton is i believe 7200 or so? , i cant understand why i couldn't get in 'nicely'......oh well....practice practice, Im sure you all can nail it. Getting out may be interesting, it's missing a required 1000 plus feet.

Ian that dude is back here at the end of the month, I'll bring him over....he will be impressed and may be able to add something to the archive winkyy.gif

Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Nov 6 2011,2:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That 2nd Galaxy shot in the fog is magic! clapping.gif

Thanks Trolly......decided to change the weather, so i couldnt see the end of the runway racing toward me unsure.gif

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:39 pm
by Ian Warren
Reading about a Galaxy mission this morning , the C5A was power by 4X 41,000 lb thrust and required 2540 meters takeoff , was to check CHCH airport history , that stage the runway was a bit shorter than what it is today at 3250 meters , also did not mention the weights , but i would say that was the 105 tonne payload .

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 2:11 pm
by dbcunnz
Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Nov 5 2011,9:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Working up to a comp screen, but I'll throw these in here for now....

Marty I hope you are going to take the frame off the one you do for the comp screen winkyy.gif laugh.gif

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:00 pm
by Naki
Beautiful shots ...especially the C-5/C-17 shots.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 6:22 pm
by Splitpin
dbcunnz wrote:
QUOTE (dbcunnz @ Nov 6 2011,3:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Marty I hope you are going to take the frame off the one you do for the comp screen winkyy.gif laugh.gif


Yes sir thumbup1.gif

Naki wrote:
QUOTE (Naki @ Nov 6 2011,4:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Beautiful shots ...especially the C-5/C-17 shots.


Thanks Naki....Im still in my big gray mode at the moment....just love that area 51 stuff, no so much for the flying, but they screen up really good.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:18 pm
by Kiwia1spad
cool pics S/P... where do i get the argosy from and is it FSX Accel compatible?

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:03 pm
by dbcunnz
Kiwia1spad wrote:
QUOTE (Kiwia1spad @ Nov 6 2011,8:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
cool pics S/P... where do i get the argosy from and is it FSX Accel compatible?

PM me your email and I can post you a CD with the Argosy 2 textures Mt Cook HS 748 2 textures and Andover with 4 RNZAF textures
If you are interested let me know

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:09 pm
by deeknow
Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Nov 6 2011,2:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That 2nd Galaxy shot in the fog is magic! clapping.gif

As a hamiltonian I can verify that is very realistic and very familiar laugh.gif
Great pics marty

PostPosted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:27 pm
by zkcav
Those shots remind me of winter at home ohmy.gif ...nothing like a Waikato fog.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:40 am
by Splitpin
deeknow wrote:
QUOTE (deeknow @ Nov 6 2011,9:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
As a hamiltonian I can verify that is very realistic and very familiar laugh.gif
Great pics marty


Thanks deeknow , and you too zkcav ,the C-5 shots are a bit of a fantasy but i was real happy with the way they came out.....thanks again.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:08 pm
by Rotordude
QUOTE (Splitpin)
[/quote]


Strewth mate, SP that is just bitchin... Love the others but that gets the gold star... clapping.gif

PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:37 pm
by Splitpin
laugh.gif Rotor....you have a way with words...glad you like it. I really wasnt sure about that one....thanks for looking thumbup1.gif

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:52 am
by Ian Warren
It interesting , we see 747 well not so much anymore in CHCH but you see a freighter and appear to overshadow or seem bigger , the Russian counterpart An124 not much bigger , 1988 from runway level pulls up and dose a wing over , 150 thousand people all wooooo,d and said F...ar ... out ! . smile.gif

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:05 pm
by Splitpin
Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 8 2011,6:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It interesting , we see 747 well not so much anymore in CHCH but you see a freighter and appear to overshadow or seem bigger , the Russian counterpart An124 not much bigger , 1988 from runway level pulls up and dose a wing over , 150 thousand people all wooooo,d and said F...ar ... out ! . smile.gif


From all accounts the C-5 is very maneuverable for such a big bird......interesting talking to a guy who flew them, when they need a top up...they push a kind of bow wave ahead, that can cause the KC's a few problems.....what a monster...just love it.

PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:12 am
by Ian Warren
The bigger they are the easier they are to fly , the early C5 were a little lessor due to the power rating and TF39s , the M model is a whole different beast bringing it more in line with example the Russian 124 in respect to lifting and flight .

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:36 am
by Splitpin
Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Nov 9 2011,8:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The bigger they are the easier they are to fly , the early C5 were a little lessor due to the power rating and TF39s , the M model is a whole different beast bringing it more in line with example the Russian 124 in respect to lifting and flight .

The 124 into Hamilton will be my next mission......can only try, and will make for some interesting screens winkyy.gif

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:34 am
by Ian Warren
Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Nov 11 2011,10:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The 124 into Hamilton will be my next mission......

When they first put the 124 into Richmond back in 88 , he stop so quick only to find turnoffs along the runway would not suit and had to be invited to the end , only problem you have is the turnaround s or even getting to the ramp .