Portover

[lowflier]

With the upcoming RNZAF MP thing (hoping we can get it on the road) I dug out my Razbam A-4s from the old external. Works alright in FSX, VC a bit dodgy but I'm not too fussed.

[Ian Warren]

I have the RAZBAM and found it more accurate externally the Nigel,s model .. and that is from the screens , to many simple eye balled outta shape , simply not correct .

[Timmy74]

Great shot Lowflier!

Tim....

[Splitpin]

[lowflier]

QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jan 26 2012,4:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I have the RAZBAM and found it more accurate externally the Nigel,s model .. and that is from the screens , to many simple eye balled outta shape , simply not correct .

I had them both side by side in formation today and I noticed the only major difference is the length of the nose. I do wish however the razbam one had all the nifty animations Nigel's one has

[Ian Warren]

QUOTE (lowflier @ Jan 26 2012,6:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I had them both side by side in formation today and I noticed the only major difference is the length of the nose. I do wish however the razbam one had all the nifty animations Nigel's one has

Nifty animates would be great , not sure what it comes with , Razbam A4 is very old but the shape and design is unmistakable , Nije,s A4 has a fuselage shape , to wide , it in itself has a small rule area fuselage , they are quite a bit more sleeker , intake well outta shape and nose , also have floating badge both tail and intake , these are taken from point when released , the hex shape , points in build rather than being rounded , having a already huge source at home here we now have the , both TA and A s in the museum , which is no excuse as we have had the A4 in Wigram since the beginning so for a ChCh lad , why did he rush it so much ! . Nigel has stopped here before for resource and chat about design .