Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 17 2013,10:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>My fave flight is in the "Classic"737-200 .. Captain 737 beats the EX-320 hands down into Queenie ...
Of course what Ian means is the 737-300 Classic as there is no such thing as a 737-200 classic
deeknow wrote:QUOTE (deeknow @ Jun 18 2013,11:18 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Of course what Ian means is the 737-300 Classic as there is no such thing as a 737-200 classic
Here we go again
.. 300s were the New Generation
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 18 2013,10:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Here we go again
.. 300s were the New Generation
Sorry Ian, your just plain wrong mate. It's you vs the rest of the planet on this one
deeknow wrote:QUOTE (deeknow @ Jun 18 2013,1:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Sorry Ian, your just plain wrong mate. It's you vs the rest of the planet on this one
I stick with the first writing ... Boeing changed it ... sorta like the Dictionary of old , a game of Fooseball changed all the rules , back in my day the NG 1983/84/85 as the aircraft was loosing the Banana's for Buns it was writing and said there go's the "Classic" .. so short are the memories ... New to Next .. recent published text pushed it further back .. as said pushed the 'Classic' back to the class .. strange to forget the "Classic" of 1964 idea .
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jun 18 2013,7:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Re the "classic " thing .... whatever ...... i doubt very much there is any difference ......
Arr the "CLASSIC" argument , Boeing or the Arbust ...
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 18 2013,7:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Arr the "CLASSIC" argument , Boeing or the Arbust ...
Lets not and say we did