BendyFlyer wrote:Agree re a good FSX design, not that there is anything wrong with the work by JBK in fact his models have stood the test of time, they are all classics. It is a pity he dissappeared from the sim world.
I completely agree, his external modelling on all his flying boats really have nothing to compare to.
BendyFlyer wrote:I have tweaked the textures and cockpit as best I can but there is not much to improve really as they had quite simple instrument panels due no clutter from radios and other electronic or electrical gadgets. I have found JBK's texture mapping a bit weird at times and you get unexpected outcomes which has to do with the model coding itself. A model with a really good build and 3D design would be fantastic. JBK's Shorts all perform as per the book and with a freeware Pegasus engine sound pack and a rewrite of sound cfg to make it 4 engines I find it great. No vices, even copes with FSX's weird water-air transition and coding.
I would like to get upto MOTAT again , they were showing interest with two of my paintings, the Solent and the Sunderland tho nothing come of it at the mo, just get up there to photo the internals of both aircraft, you have done a fantastic modification , It would a real cue if JBK gave you the source files to work with.
BendyFlyer wrote:I was smitten by the romance of flying boats and the simple brute power of having, on a regular basis when a lad, have a big white RNZAF Sunderland go over your head and watch them land and take off was an experience you can never forget. They were big aeroplanes then and still are. I know from reading the accounts of operations and flights in the Shorts that the crew would have had very little time to do nothing, in fact the opposite. They had to run the engine controls from the rear of the cabin, do all the navigation, fuel management, general paperwork and worry about the route because they were no radio navaids and you can imagine how reliable(not) any weather forecast for the flight was, you could arrive and quite a few did, in the dark in a sandstorm or seriously bad weather after hours flying and probably two to three legs or over ten hours stick time, then find a way to somehow get in VFR.
I am still amazed at how advanced they were in every respect you can think off. While Kingsford Smith is buzzing about essentially in a post WW1 design the Fokker, Shorts come up with the C Class flying boat. All aluminium, flush rivets, simple fuel system, advanced electrical systems and electrical controls, auto pilot, and still flown only with two pilots and a radio officer, no FE just a steward and a clerk for the passengers. They get hot and cold meals, wine service, toilets and big comfortable leather seats and even a smoking lounge, and now you can fly across the world in days and they did. Internally they were basically a double-decker Dash8. I still reckon it is amazing that a 26 year old Kiwi gets a Command on a pommy airline in the midst of the Great Depression. Bit like doing charter in a tiger moth and then getting command on a 747 today.
Jack Burgess is part of my interest in NZ Aviation History from the 30's to the 1960's and inevitably that leads you to flying boats and it was amazing that of all the countries in the world, only NZ (after the UK and Imperial Airways ten years before) made these aeroplanes work commercially and safety wise (Ansett's Lord Howe Island run might have lasted longer but its ops were pretty limited to SY-LHI. The Empire boats and the Solents are a great record especially for TEAL aka Air NZ. Alas aeroplanes with wheels and jet engines spelt their demise. Never met or see an ex flying boat driver who did not say it was the best flying they ever did, they loved it!
Other than the plans I have here I do like following up on the history, one neighbour went overseas, island hopping so to speak, looking after his cat and the mail he brought me back three large 1950s T.E.A.L travel posters , they really suit the one area and space in my place here.