Page 1 of 1

Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 6:20 am
by hasegawa
Around Nellis AFB to Grand Canyon West. I have used the Stock M.B. 339 ...
Well, a lot must be done, to reach the level off other Simulation. The aircraft "out of the box" are very limited. The navigation is o.k., but there is no AI, no communication... but in one point it is a good thing, the optics .... But it is not global.
Nevada, Arizona and California, in the box and Utah, New York Area and Switzerland as Addons.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:01 am
by Charl
Think how well that might transplant to NZ...

Re: Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:44 am
by deeknow
certainly LOOKS impressive, very photo-real anyway. Whats the FPS like?

Re: Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 10:12 am
by hasegawa
It´s framerate-friendly. As long, as I do no aerobatics... . But, don´t forget, that it has not something, every other Simulation did. Frame Eater like AI, extern weather Engine and a lot of addons are often enough der Problem of other simulations. With all these things think, that Aerofly 2 is also hardware-hungry.

Re: Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 12:11 pm
by Aharon
Awesome desert ground textures!!!

You should have flown to Area 51 airport :lol: :lol: :lol:

Regards,

Aharon

Re: Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 5:36 pm
by hasegawa
This one is good! :clap: Believe me... it was Grand Canyon West.

Re: Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:52 am
by Splitpin
Fantastic shots , love them all. #6 is my favorite ..so real :clap:

Re: Some pictures from Aerofly 2

PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:16 pm
by hasegawa
Thank You Splitpin. Aerofly looks good. The problem is, that the rest needs more attention. But this is not the End-Version. Work is in progress.