Page 1 of 1

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:51 am
by Montie

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:56 am
by victor_alpha_charlie
:o
I can't wait to see your screenshot comp entry!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:03 am
by hasegawa
Thud-Boom...

Well, I think, it was a sluggish and underpowered aircraft and a Maintenance-Nightmare. It was only good flying Mach 2 without external weapons and straight ahead. Nearly half of the production was destroyed in Vietnam. Yes, 27.5 "kills" against obsolete MiG 17´s, but ... 320 losses in combat and 382 total... mostly against Anti-aircraft-missiles.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:30 am
by benwynn
He Might not enter, seeing as hes in Denmark. No Offence, but I hope you dont enter :P

Again, another Amazing Shot!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:21 pm
by Q300
Man these shots are crazy!!

Bloody awesome work keep em comin :thumbup:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:53 pm
by Ian Warren
hasegawa wrote:
QUOTE (hasegawa @ Feb 10 2008, 10:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thud-Boom...

Well, I think, it was a sluggish and underpowered aircraft and a Maintenance-Nightmare. It was only good flying Mach 2 without external weapons and straight ahead. Nearly half of the production was destroyed in Vietnam. Yes, 27.5 "kills" against obsolete MiG 17´s, but ... 320 losses in combat and 382 total... mostly against Anti-aircraft-missiles.

Aircraft concept/design of the 50s , J75 s still push it along , 1390 mph and could hold its own with the 17 , at least it had a cannon ! all saying It did have an amazing combat record ! mainly the fact there was nothing else with it caliber/strengths , mentioned it failing was Ground fire ! and most targets the Thud's went after were the hi defended areas !


benwynn wrote:
QUOTE (benwynn @ Feb 10 2008, 10:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
He Might not enter, seeing as hes in Denmark. No Offence, but I hope you dont enter :P

Again, another Amazing Shot!

Love to see the cost to Montie to collect his prize :lol: .............. LOVE THE THUD ! :thumbup: