100% ad-free

Mynameisnemo wrote:QUOTE (Mynameisnemo @ Mar 26 2013,2:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Compared to the "pirated" files, I can easily tell which group has put more than a lot of hard work into bringing Christchurch to life in FSX, and that is definitely the members of this forum!
Question for the Mods/Admin's, is there a way to restrict the download of any files posted i.e the AGN's until a specific post count has been made? would stop people who have just registered to download the files and upload them to the other sites?
I am going to look into seeing if we can restrict the downloading of attachment on members files to only be available to members who are logged in the problem now is that anyone can get the attachments om a post whether they are logged in or not so any guest whether they are a member or not can just look at the posts on the forum and if they see an attachment they can just help themselves to it
another way which I have suggested to Ian was to not place the attachment in his post but to ask them to send a PM and we can send the files through the file transfer system which then restricts then so we know who is getting them
creator2003 wrote:QUOTE (creator2003 @ Mar 26 2013,10:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Have you tryed the real Dotcom site for this file share www.mega.co.nz ,the encryption keys may help limit the people you want while still able to give to those asking etc ..
Dotcom .. IanDotcom sounds better , you should not have to do that although not a bad idea ... end of the day the whole picture is you don't steal other peoples work ... and then post it as there own !
Nice thing , this is the first time since the since these people started this four years back that finally the thread stayed open for all to see and learn the truth ! and sweep it under the carpet so ... Thanks Rob and Paul for keeping this thread alive and as a timely warning .Last edited by Ian Warren on Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

dbcunnz wrote:QUOTE (dbcunnz @ Mar 26 2013,4:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>What a battle didn't get to bed until almost 5 am this morning but it appears that I finally convinced Pete that Tracey was pulling the wool over his eyes and for him to do a check and just verify that the John Haines he was corresponding with was in fact the real John Haines or a one James Harris using John's name as an alias
But yes it was a great feeling to finally climb out of bed at midday and see that Pete had removed the file and yes after I had warned him that by removing it he was opening himself up to a barrage of very abusive emails but at least they would show her up for what she really is.
So dear God lets hope this is the last we see of hear of the Thatchers
PS last month when her file was taken off (because she had two of my files in it) the four sites she had uploaded to I received 9 yes 9 abusive emails from her in 1 hour so I just hope that Pete is not in for the same.
If "she" is indeed a she .... sounds to me like a whole bunch of uninspired sicko's hell bent on stirring things up for their own odd gratification ..... maybe some link to Snowmans troubles as well (my opinion) ...who would know.
I understand fully why you guys did what you did ...i do admire principles, and your efforts very much , but I got a little nervous (i have to be honest) about the potential for one of these people , or their cronies to damage (or worse) the (our) forum as some form of retaliation.
As you say Doug "So dear God lets hope this is the last we see of hear of the Thatchers "
Anyway, that's my 10 cents worth...... carry on

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests