wildmanfiveone wrote:QUOTE (wildmanfiveone @ Apr 25 2012,11:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The question is will this one have a vc?
No. https://microsoftflight.com/en-US/marketplace/#5- Eddy
100% ad-free
wildmanfiveone wrote:QUOTE (wildmanfiveone @ Apr 25 2012,11:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The question is will this one have a vc?
No. https://microsoftflight.com/en-US/marketplace/#5- Eddy
AndrewJamez wrote:QUOTE (AndrewJamez @ Mar 6 2012,6:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Apart from the nice lighting and clouds, it looks just like some orbx scenery. Still no decent land/water transition and the inland water has the same effect as at sea. Would have been nice if MS had worked a bit harder in those area's.
I think of MS Flight as FSX SP3... And I totally agree: time to get serious about representing river (and lake) water properly, as well as having proper Outerra-class shorelines / transitions. Flight is still stuck in 2005 / 06 programming / thinking for its visuals overall, methinks.
AndrewJamez wrote:QUOTE (AndrewJamez @ Apr 25 2012,8:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I'm thinking P3D as well. Apparently most addons work. The problem is the Exec files and master folders are a different name so the FSX installers dont see them. All that is required is you have a base installation of FSX so after you install the addon you just transfer the installed files into P3D. Most people are having great sucsess using this method.
Another method is to have a copy of your fsx.exe (or one of prepar3d.exe renamed to fsx.exe) in your P3D directory as the install target. This will work with installers where you can select the path. For installers with a fixed path, alter your FSX registry entry so it points to the P3D folder (several applications are available which can add or change an FSX path in this way).
AdeAdrian Petford
West Midlands, UK
I spend eleven months of the year in the UK and one in NZ. I'm hoping to improve that... ;-)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests