Alabeo Cessna 207

Read and report on flightsim developers progress of upcoming or completed products

Postby Tupolev114 » Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:20 pm

wow something fsx has needed for a long time
Tupolev114
Member
 
Topic author
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 2:54 pm
Posts: 59

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:54 pm

I would prefer a Cessna T-37 "Tweetie" Dragonfly .... surely Alabeo must be all GA'ed out along with it's sister Carenado counterpart !
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby FlyingKiwi » Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:08 pm

Good - I was hoping someone would do one of these!
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby ardypilot » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:38 am

Sweet, would be good to see a MDZ skin for it:

User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:47 am

biggrin.gif A stretched sausage dog Cessna, I guess five seater?
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Naki » Sun Jun 08, 2014 3:59 pm

Seven... Hence 207
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7170
Location: Tauranga

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:05 pm

Naki wrote:
QUOTE (Naki @ Jun 8 2014,4:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Seven... Hence 207

OK ... Jezz you would not want to throw 'Big Mummer' in the back then .. be a bloody mission to all get on board !
Last edited by Ian Warren on Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Naki » Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:08 pm

Yeah looks like you could easily have c of g issues if you are not careful
Last edited by Naki on Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7170
Location: Tauranga

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Jun 08, 2014 4:12 pm

Well they did it back in the 1950s .. weighing passengers to put them in correct CG placement pre boarding ... maybe another kids in the back jobbie.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby cowpatz » Sun Jun 08, 2014 6:41 pm

I used to fly one of these back in the mid eighties, ZK-DSE, on a regular service from Ardmore and Auckland (on demand) to Waiheke airfield (The old Stonyridge strip that used to be next to Stonyridge Winery and is now actually part of it). The winery and it's owner is another story smile.gif
They are a great machine but not as good as the 206. Despite marginally more horsepower it had a slightly different wing and just lacked that zing the 206 had. Still a great workhorse.
Numerous times the aircraft would crash on it's tail during loading or on shutdown if not careful. If it did sit on it's tail then after climbing aboard and starting it up, the check was to see if it would come down onto the nosewheel with just a smidgin more than idle RPM.
If it did then it was within the CofG range. If not it required a reshuffle. It never did impress the boss when you parked up outside the office, cut the engine and then have it crash on it's tail!
I can recall one day being rostered for an afternoon Waiheke return in the 207 but as I was running late with a student on an IFR training flight another one of our pilots had to fly it for me. My replacement had the misfortune to have a engine failure on the way back and had to put it down on some mudflats around the Maraetai area. He did a good job with minimal damage but both he and the aircraft were covered in mud.
Cost me a few beers that night.

The Stonyridge airfield was quite a tricky one to operate to and from (being a one way strip) and there was quite a battle when the Reeves airstrip opened up.

A tale of two airfields

ZK-DSE around 1989 in it's post Motor Holdings/Flightline days (with a yuk paint scheme I might add):

Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby FlyingKiwi » Sun Jun 08, 2014 6:44 pm

Interesting stuff, thanks for that post. I was talking to someone very recently who flew both the 207 and 206 in Africa and was of the same opinion that the 206 was the more enjoyable aircraft.
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Jun 08, 2014 6:57 pm

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Jun 8 2014,7:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Numerous times the aircraft would crash on it's tail during loading or on shutdown if not careful. If it did sit on it's tail then after climbing aboard and starting it up,

Arr the Beers, that is what they are for, I am very surprised they did have a load pillar built onto airframe, would not have been a silly idea.
Last edited by Ian Warren on Sun Jun 08, 2014 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Splitpin » Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:46 pm

Great post CP .... and i agree "yuk paint scheme " , like 80's toilet wallpaper .
I would like to see a turbine version of this for fsx.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21332
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby cowpatz » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:49 am

Would a Soloy C206 do instead Marty?
Remember the 50-50-90 rule. Anytime you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability you'll get it wrong!

Image
User avatar
cowpatz
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:28 pm
Posts: 3739

Postby Splitpin » Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:22 am

cowpatz wrote:
QUOTE (cowpatz @ Jun 12 2014,8:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Would a Soloy C206 do instead Marty?


Indeed CP thumbup1.gif Will keep an eye on this ... cheers.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21332
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby SeanTK » Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:53 pm

Cessna 206s and 207s always look like they'll just take a slight tap or breeze to put them on their tails while sitting still. I wonder if it's a common occurrence...
User avatar
SeanTK
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:27 am
Posts: 1617

Postby Ian Warren » Thu Jun 12, 2014 2:56 pm

SeanTK wrote:
QUOTE (SeanTK @ Jun 12 2014,3:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Cessna 206s and 207s always look like they'll just take a slight tap or breeze to put them on their tails while sitting still. I wonder if it's a common occurrence...

Two door seven seat, a case of folding seats down ... just don't put 'big mama' in the back, maybe the cargo panier for her.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51


Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests