Run!!!!

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby chopper_nut » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:18 pm

Brennanx wrote: But still some ATC people make mistakes.

As do some pilots
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
chopper_nut
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Wherever the work is

Postby chopper_nut » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:21 pm

kiwiflyboy wrote: I object to everyone saying it was a balls up by ATC, it was probably a good idea to put the 172 first, remembering that the 172, doesn't need to use full length, the 747 will, also the taxi speeds wont vary too much, and having the 172 take off first, means that no aircraft will have to be sittting on the ground due to wake turbulence....

Also, that photo could be quite deceiving Its taken with quite a big telephoto lense which tends to bring the background in closer than it really is. As a side note, I experienced jet blast off a 733 that was taking off infront of us in a C172 as we were flying the approach. Very interesting experience.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
chopper_nut
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Wherever the work is

Postby scon » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:29 pm

towerguy wrote: amazing how even you "wanna be" pilots automatically assume its "cr@p planning" by ATC - how about the Dumbass cessna pilot that took the wrong taxiway or the poor cessna pilot that got a brake lockup or something -Oh NOOOO its cr@p planning by ATC - I can't wait until I have you sitting in the controllers seat and I am your instructor - then we will see what real stress and sweat is! you pilots see your own aeroplane and maybe one or two others and hear one or two frequencies - try sitting in a control room or tower some time listening to multiple radios running dozens of aircraft on split frequencies all saying "we can make number one" usually while we are short staffed, the weather is cr@p , half the taxiways are blocked off, management wants you to move double the number of aircraft while putting more restrictions on what you can and cannot say or do - all the time trying to get you all in and out as quickly and easily as possible with as little hassle as we can. Do it day in and day out for year after year and what will you get - "cr@p planning by ATC" but make one questionable move and it's 'oh yeah ATC ballsed it up-again!" well next time you fly and I recognise the voice you had better be holding 210% route fuel and Island holding reserve and don't forget to double check that route MSA and the 25nm min alt - you never know I might make a cr@p decision - involving a bl@@dy great hill! :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

Deep breaths
scon
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

Postby towerguy » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:42 pm

To all

I apologise if I was out of line and flew off the handle
we are copping some flak from various directions at the moment and this may have been one extra that broke the camels back so to speak. It seems that as we get close to a pay negotiation we suddenly become underworked money grabbing primadonnas that could be replaced by a suitably trained monkey with the right machine. its only the rest of the time that we keep a shakey ATC system running at all using cobbled equipment dubiously managed - us and the techs who do a bloody fantastic job!

again I apologise for flying off the handle.
Towerguy.
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby Brennanx » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:47 pm

Nah it was cool :thumbup: it shows never say anything bad to an ATC person because they might right a page of writing telling you about how your going to die in a firey death.
Last edited by Brennanx on Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brennanx
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 6:47 pm
Posts: 795

Postby chopper_nut » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:48 pm

towerguy wrote: underworked money grabbing primadonnas that could be replaced by a suitably trained monkey with the right machine.

Haha, sounds a bit like my workplace at times! I know some of the controllers here at NZWN so I hear some of the stuff that goes on behind the scenes.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
chopper_nut
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 2977
Location: Wherever the work is

Postby Draconian » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:38 pm

So day rise de minimum wage today :lol:
Draconian
 

Postby Jimmy » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:22 am

sorry about that towerguy, I just saw a lighty put infront of a heavy, espeicly if it wasn't a taxi way parralel to the rwy I thought it woudl have been atc who did that, seeing they direct the traffic but of course it is quite likely the pilots mistake.. Sorry twrguy, no offence at you mate :)

James
Jimmy
 

Postby Charl » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:29 am

Matter of interest, how are priorities decided?
I've sat in a 747 idling at the hold short for what seemed like ages, and then eventually this little 10-seater thing flies in and lands, then taxies halfway down the runway before turning off.
Sure you don't want littlies flying into wake turbulence, but think of the cost of holding up a Jumbo?
Are all aircraft treated as equal?
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby ardypilot » Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:02 am

Sure you don't want littlies flying into wake turbulence, but think of the cost of holding up a Jumbo?

On another note, I read a book once (true story) about a Cessna flying out of Seattle that was hit by turbulence from a 747, shaking it so violently that the pilot was knocked out cold, as was the passenger. When the passenger came too a few minutes later, he realised he could not see as he was blinded by blood on this face (or something), and ATC managed to talk him through an emergency landing after he made a mayday call!

Also, in another simular story- my mates Dad in England (who now controls London Gatwick tower) once talked a kid through landing a Cessna in Wales when the pilot had a heart attack and died during a flight.

So big kudos to ATC, we wouldn't be flying without 'em!
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby towerguy » Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:28 am

there is always a whole bigger picture out there than can be seen from a cockpit or even a tower cab etc. for example yes you are sitting at the hold in your 747 for what seems like a while but then the A340 that took off ahead is still climbing out at 140kt groundspeed and can't turn north till through 3000ft due noise restrictions and although maybe we could line you up ready to go it would be tight and maybe risk a go round for the 10-seater on final which happens to be an ambulance flight,and is the weather above or below circling minima for his category and if he is forced to go around you would end up waiting even further while he clears the departure path and the 767 on final behind him is now at 3 mile final with a 747 on the runway that can't go anywhere and there is a lighty in the missed approach area for him as well, all this while the Notam refering to "reduced capacity" that we are seeing more and more often really means that either the tower or radar is operating short staffed and may have 1 controller covering two positions. might sound fanciful but his is just an actual example of situations we see over and over every day. On one particularly bad day with wx on mins and traffic backed up all over the countryand the phone going constantly I had to explain to a 747 SKIPPER that his delay was caused by having to take time out to explain to every damned pilot what the delay was- look out the bloody window! Yes I am more than willing to admit when I have stuffed up - it's all taped anyway- but sometimes when you see and hear what is going on out there you just can't help but hang your head and shake it in dispair!
Is it any wonder that I haven't been up for real in so long.

one final example - very recently a pilot of a heavy flying a particularly low approach to the displaced threshold 23L rang to complain that the Papis needed calibrating because they all showed red! - Duh!? and that is the honest to goodness truth!
Last edited by towerguy on Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby HardCorePawn » Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:45 am

one final example - very recently a pilot of a heavy flying a particularly low approach to the displaced threshold 23L rang to complain that the Papis needed calibrating because they all showed red! - Duh!? and that is the honest to goodness truth!


ahahahahahahahaahahah thats hilarious... :D

until the next time i'm sitting in the cabin and i remember that this guy could be in the little room at the front :blink:
"Son, we are about the break the surly bonds of gravity, and punch the face of God." -- Homer Simpson

Image
User avatar
HardCorePawn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: 2500' above Godzone

Postby Charl » Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:57 am

It's all a bit like hearing surgeons' tales over the dinner table - you're not sure you really want to hear this, but it's too fascinating to leave :D

So how about a rundown of who does what, and when, to keep those birds out of each other's slipsteam, and from tripping over each other's taxiway?
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby towerguy » Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:09 pm

okay charl that sounds like a good idea - it may take a month or so (or more) to put it all together as I am also trying to fit in a trip around the world at the same time as actually going to work and talk to these aeroplanes - an overall summary of ATC as it's supposed to be and what it's really like. <_<
CPU- i7 4790K @4.0Gb Cooler- Noctua NH-D15 M/B- Z97 ProGamer P/S- 750W RAM- 16Gb
Graphics- Nvidia GTX970 16Gb Drives- 2x 120Gb SSD Samsung 850EVO, 1x 2Tb HD, 1x DVD-RW
Sound- on M/B Logitec 5.1 surround sound system OS- Win 10 pro , all wrapped in a black Corsair case Display - Panasonic UHD 4k 50" Flatscreen TV.( 3840x2160 Res)
User avatar
towerguy
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 886

Postby ZK-KAG » Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:23 pm

Personally I think some people have jumped to conclusions about that photo.... Who says that the Cessna is stopped or cant taxi just as fast or even faster than the heavy... I wouldnt want to be in the Cessna behind the jumbo. :P

And TG I have seen first hand the problems with "reduced capacity", as the staff in Palmy tower are always stretched, even more so now as 2 are moving to CH to do radar... Having been up a few times now, they are really really busy when the commercials come in and out along with two other training organisations circuiting bug-smashers...

~ZK-KAG~
"ZK-KAG"
"We who fly do so for the love of flying. We are alive in the air with this miracle that lies in our hands and beneath our feet"

Image
Check out all the multiplayer action @ ARNZX "FNF"
ZK-KAG
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:20 pm
Posts: 729
Location: Palmerston North / Auckland

Postby scon » Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:48 pm

Ahhhh the joys of flying out of Ardmore ;)

everyone screaming down 118.1 at each other as the Ardmore Flying School guys try to replicate top gun and break the 250kt speed restriction in there 172's <_<
scon
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

Postby Charl » Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:06 pm

towerguy wrote: okay charl that sounds like a good idea - it may take a month or so (or more) to put it all together as I am also trying to fit in a trip around the world at the same time as actually going to work and talk to these aeroplanes - an overall summary of ATC as it's supposed to be and what it's really like. <_<

Actually thought I was pushing my luck there :rolleyes:
But if you can find the time, it'd be a splendid insight for everyone, remember there are lots of budding pilots here too.
Really looking forward to that one, thanks TG.
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby kiwiflyboy » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:47 pm

scon wrote: Ahhhh the joys of flying out of Ardmore ;)

everyone screaming down 118.1 at each other as the Ardmore Flying School guys try to replicate top gun and break the 250kt speed restriction in there 172's <_<

Lord only knows how many times, i have selected flap in the downwind and slowed down to accommodate for other aircraft in the circuit.... I think you will find the majority of AFS people (who actually continue past a PPL) are very decent people.
kiwiflyboy
 

Postby scon » Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:05 pm

kiwiflyboy wrote:
scon wrote: Ahhhh the joys of flying out of Ardmore  ;)

everyone screaming down 118.1 at each other as the Ardmore Flying School guys try to replicate top gun and break the 250kt speed restriction in there 172's  <_<

Lord only knows how many times, i have selected flap in the downwind and slowed down to accommodate for other aircraft in the circuit.... I think you will find the majority of AFS people (who actually continue past a PPL) are very decent people.

I have nothing against them, but many a time have I extended downwind for a AFS guy only to find out that when I turn final 2 of his buddies have jumped onto final behind him, a problem for me as my Grumman has a faster approach speed would it have been to much to ask if they had just considered airmanship.
scon
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:16 pm
Posts: 963
Location: NZ

Postby kiwiflyboy » Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:01 pm

Grumman............. faster approach speed? what is you approach speed?
kiwiflyboy
 

PreviousNext

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests