




Karl
Court Line Flyer (UK)
100% ad-free






Trolly wrote:QUOTE (Trolly @ Apr 8 2008, 05:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>That would be the 747-400, not -200 wouldn't it? Project Opensky v4 model I presume- one of my favourite freeware heavies![]()
Not -400 -no winglets, if if not a 200, its probably a 300Nick
Trolly wrote:QUOTE (Trolly @ Apr 8 2008, 06:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>That would be the 747-400, not -200 wouldn't it? Project Opensky v4 model I presume- one of my favourite freeware heavies![]()
Most definately not -200. Look closely at the "bump". A lot smaller than -400

greaneyr wrote:QUOTE (greaneyr @ Apr 8 2008, 07:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The -200s have different looking engines too. The back of the engines on the ANZ -400 protrude a lot further than those do. That's definitely a -200. It's confusing people since it's in the latest livery. I'm not sure how long our -200s wore that livery. I know the -400s wore the previous one.
It actually depends what type of engine they have. The engines on this one (RR's), look short and fat, but the PW engines are longer/thinner.
victor_alpha_charlie wrote:QUOTE (victor_alpha_charlie @ Apr 8 2008, 08:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>It actually depends what type of engine they have.
Yeah, like I said 'the back of the engines on the ANZ -400s protrude a lot further than those do'. Those are the RB-211s that our -200s had.
greaneyr wrote:QUOTE (greaneyr @ Apr 8 2008, 08:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah, like I said 'the back of the engines on the ANZ -400s protrude a lot further than those do'. Those are the RB-211s that our -200s had.
Whoops, missed that. Early morning this morning
Daniel wrote:QUOTE (Daniel @ Apr 8 2008, 08:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>What does the title say?NZ B747-200 in LAX
![]()
Cheers
Daniel
Hey, I said it was a 742 all along..

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests