100% ad-free

Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ Dec 9 2008, 02:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yep, I was right...it's a TROLL!
Haven't seen one of those in a while, NZFF tends to be a lot more civilised than that...
Huh?Last edited by NZ255 on Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.Nick
NZ255 wrote:QUOTE (NZ255 @ Dec 9 2008, 02:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Huh?
he's elaborating to the fact that there seems to be a certain advertising campaign being waged here at the moment which will invariably result in a cat fight.Last edited by ronindanbo on Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pilot.masman wrote:QUOTE (pilot.masman @ Dec 9 2008, 04:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>i repeat NZ255's quote , huh??
not an advertising campaign
Charl's just alluding to the fact that you're wearing an ARNZX cap, and also waving the ARNZX flag. I don't personally have an issue with it, but I can see what he's getting at.
Alex
ronindanbo wrote:QUOTE (ronindanbo @ Dec 9 2008, 03:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>hes ellaborating to the fact that there seems to be a certain advertising campaign being waged here at the moment which will invariably result in a cat fight.
I'm sure the mod(s) will do their thing (politely!)
As a matter of interest - what's the general ruling on signatures? I've just added one of my own to see what one would look like (I couldn't be bothered, normally). Or is the issue not so much the signatures themselves as using posts with minimal content as blatant plugs for something or other?
For instance - is my (newly created) shameless plug for my "day job" OK? Genuine question!Last edited by Adamski on Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alex wrote:QUOTE (Alex @ Dec 9 2008, 04:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>We don't have a ruling on signatures, only thing applicable there is that I (we?) don't like them to be too large (vertically). I'd prefer my mouse's scrollwheel to last a few more years.
I've always hated them. Text is OK, but large images can slow down long pages terribly - particularly for those people on slow Internet connections (ie. The whole of NZ).
If I were Prime Minister, I'd restrict signature images to 24px * 2px
Adamski wrote:QUOTE (Adamski @ Dec 9 2008, 04:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I've always hated them. Text is OK, but large images can slow down long pages terribly - particularly for those people on slow Internet connections (ie. The whole of NZ).
If I were Prime Minister, I'd restrict signature images to 24px * 2px
You can actually turn them off, which can be helpful sometimes.
Go to My Controls > Board Settings and then there's an option "Do you wish to view members signatures when reading topics?", you can select No.
Alex

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests