100% ad-free
dask77 wrote:QUOTE (dask77 @ Dec 20 2008, 05:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>who thinks that there should be a BAe 146-300 for FSX
ME ME ME!!!!!
I have a Dutch friend that used to fly ATR's. He's transferred to the 146's and *loves* them! He does cargo (TNT), mainly Europe .. but says it's a great plane to fly. I gave him an old FS9 repaint to play with in FS, but he wasn't too impressed (he's FSX anyway)!
His old version of the Flight1 ATR, (which he gave to me) he *was* impressed by.
ronindanbo wrote:QUOTE (ronindanbo @ Dec 20 2008, 08:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I think he means a good oneSnap!
Yeah I'm still waiting for a GOOD BAe 146- a good external model is the key thing.
scon wrote:QUOTE (scon @ Dec 22 2008, 01:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yes, those constructive comments help the Flight Simulation community, you would think that if you have nothing nice to say then don’t say it. But hay that might just be me.
I'm not sure who you're actually replying to... but I don't see anything that negative here. I take it as a request - *we would like a good model (inside and outside) for FSX* - what's wrong with that? The FS9 version ported into FSX is useable, but it's nowhere near as good as many freeware aircraft for FSX. Hell, I wouldn't mind a good PAYWARE 146 for FSX.
leow5263 wrote:QUOTE (leow5263 @ Dec 22 2008, 01:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>that model made by Jon Murchison thats basicly a very sure sign they are great quality. and if you download them you will find they are.
Agreed - Jon's stuff is *excellent*. I think the problem here, though, is porting it to FSX. I'm not near my FS PC at the moment, but from memory, I think there were problems with either/both the 2D and VC panels. Usual FS9->FSX problems, I think.
Also, some native FSX freeware (outside) models have significantly more detail in the textures than their FS9 equivalents.
Return to All Flight Simulators
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests