AMD vs Intel

The place to ask for help or solve each others technical issues and discuss hardware

Postby ScottyB » Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:31 pm

Hi there guys,

As you'll probably know i'm still on the hunt for a new computer. What is better to run FS on: AMD or Intel? Why What exactly are these?

Thanks.
Image
User avatar
ScottyB
Sim-holic
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:58 pm
Posts: 571
Location: New Zealand

Postby brownbox » Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:50 pm

If you want to run FS the best, keep away from AMD. FS is CPU dependent, and AMD just havnt caught up with Intel yet.
You will want to get a quad core intel to run FS well. Im thinking a Core 2 Quad Q6600 should do you fine. AMDs new quad core series, the Phenom II has just caught up with the Q6600 which has been out for over a year.
Hope this helps
Desktop:Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8@ 3.0Ghz@ 1.36v. 4Gb Supertalent DDR2-800 2.1v@ 5-5-5-15. Asus P5N-E SLI Pencil Modded. Corsair TX 650. 512MB Palit Geforce 8800GT. 2x200GB IDE+640GB SATAII. Windows Vista Ultimate X86. Samsung SH-S222A
Phone:Nokia N900 Vodafone
Car: 1993 Mitsubishi Mirage Asti Z. Steel Blue Pearl

1996 Toyota Curren 2.0L 5 Spd Manual Silver. 205/50/R16 on Enkei K-95. Lowered on Jamex Superlows. Remote locking. Remote boot release. Cruise control
1996 Mitsubishi GTO MR

Image
User avatar
brownbox
Senior Member
 
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:55 pm
Posts: 1318

Postby jastheace » Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:11 pm

yes, but if you can't quite afford a intel, amd's are not that bad, i am running an AMD Phenom 9850 quad core, it seems that you have to get the best motherboard you can with the AMD's as i got the best performance with the best motherboard i could find. FYI i am running FSX with 90% of the sliders all the way up and still getting 30ish FPS.
In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has yet to lose.

Image
User avatar
jastheace
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:33 pm
Posts: 1032
Location: Hastings

Postby brownbox » Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:57 pm

i agree. Intel is ahead if cost is no issue (ie the best of the best intel vs best amd). Both are very much the muchness for the 3-400$ mark.
Desktop:Core 2 Duo E4300 1.8@ 3.0Ghz@ 1.36v. 4Gb Supertalent DDR2-800 2.1v@ 5-5-5-15. Asus P5N-E SLI Pencil Modded. Corsair TX 650. 512MB Palit Geforce 8800GT. 2x200GB IDE+640GB SATAII. Windows Vista Ultimate X86. Samsung SH-S222A
Phone:Nokia N900 Vodafone
Car: 1993 Mitsubishi Mirage Asti Z. Steel Blue Pearl

1996 Toyota Curren 2.0L 5 Spd Manual Silver. 205/50/R16 on Enkei K-95. Lowered on Jamex Superlows. Remote locking. Remote boot release. Cruise control
1996 Mitsubishi GTO MR

Image
User avatar
brownbox
Senior Member
 
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:55 pm
Posts: 1318

Postby mjrhealth » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:20 pm

Yea Intel does well but i have an amd 6400 and it desnt seem to perform much worse then the intel, hopefully ill be able to get an AMD 940 quad this next pay, thne ill write a report on the diif.
Intel 4790K 4.6Gig
8 Gig 1600 Meg ram,
Gigabyte GTX 680 2 Gig Ram
Gigabyte GAZ87X-UD3H
Win 7 64 Bit
mjrhealth
Member
 
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:21 am
Posts: 116


Return to Technical Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests