Scratch another Airbus

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby BigBird » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:19 pm

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/artic...jectid=10581646

What are they going to do? Surely all Airbuses need to be grounded until the issues are sorted out!
BigBird
Forum Addict
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:15 pm
Posts: 422

Postby Daniel » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:57 pm

Lets hope there are survivors out there. The A310 is a good aircraft but is resonably old now.
Last edited by Daniel on Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Daniel
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:42 pm
Posts: 946
Location: New Zealand

Postby Peppermint » Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:17 pm

QUOTE
Surely all Airbuses need to be grounded until the issues are sorted out![/quote]

rolleyes.gif
Peppermint
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 516
Location: Christchurch

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:34 pm

BigBird wrote:
QUOTE (BigBird @ Jun 30 2009, 03:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/artic...jectid=10581646

What are they going to do? Surely all Airbuses need to be grounded until the issues are sorted out!


Are you serious? I saw a Toyota crashed today. They should be taken off the road until there is a 100% chance that another one won't crash! rolleyes.gif dry.gif
Some people just amaze me...
Last edited by victor_alpha_charlie on Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby d3fai13r » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:35 pm

BigBird wrote:
QUOTE (BigBird @ Jun 30 2009, 03:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Surely all Airbuses need to be grounded until the issues are sorted out!

First of all A310 is old AC and now that's not many of them left in Europe. And it is not fbw designed aircraft. Ok, why B haven't grounded all its ac, when 1.5 years ago they have had serious engines problems on 777? Please don't be like journalist, count the number of pax carried on type, than count number of fatalities and then make your "genious conclusions" about grounding the whole family of aircrafts(thats something like only few thousands of aircrafts, thats absolutely nothing).
Or maybe im wrong and you have PhD in aircraft industry?
First of all, now in this recession, aircraft accidents will happen more often because maintenance costs are reduced, and its sadly. Second, here is enough A and B in the air to crash(i mean statistically, if something can brake, it will break, and if you have more aircrafts, the chance of crash increasing), so its more likely that 320 will crash more often than fe Tu-204, because there are thousands of A320 in the air, compare to few dozens of Tu-204.
Sadly news, hope there are survivers.
d3fai13r
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:10 pm
Posts: 201
Location: KBP/AKL

Postby Anthony » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:47 pm

Yeah it's a sad accident, but I think grounding all Airbuses might be a bit rash. After all the A310 is pre-FBW era which makes it a completely different beast to the A320 and A330. It's also an aging type, introduced in 1982/1983.
Image
User avatar
Anthony
Sim-holic
 
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:07 pm
Posts: 947
Location: Rotorua

Postby Alex » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:07 pm

Whoa, take it easy guys. I know it can be a hot topic, but try and keep a calm head... wink.gif

Debate the issue, not the person.

Alex
Last edited by Alex on Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby LMerraine » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:33 am

Now to start the A v B debate.

Ground all the A's that way the B's will get the sales smile.gif

(This is from an avid B fan, that finds a number of the A's growing on him - esp the 340's)
When asked what I have contributed to on this earth my reply will be my daugther
LMerraine
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:19 pm
Posts: 278
Location: Northam, WA

Postby steelsporran » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:38 am

BigBird wrote:
QUOTE (BigBird @ Jun 30 2009, 03:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/artic...jectid=10581646

What are they going to do? Surely all Airbuses need to be grounded until the issues are sorted out!


You have fallen into the same trap as the media, unfortunately the title "Airbus" lends itself to being one acft rather than a series.
steelsporran
 

Postby BigBird » Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:20 pm

laugh.gif Seem to have got quite a reaction... Okay, okay! In hindsight, yes, my comment re grounding all Airbuses was a bit rash.

What's going to happen if another one comes down in the near future? (Let's hope it doesn't happen! But with the current trend...)
Last edited by BigBird on Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BigBird
Forum Addict
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:15 pm
Posts: 422

Postby FlyingKiwi » Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:14 pm

From what I've heard, the airport in question at which the aircraft was landing is an especially difficult approach at night, with very few visual cues and high terrain in the immediate vicinity. Throwing bad weather into the mix doesn't help things. For all we know it could have been pure pilot error - it's a bit early to speculate on whether there was actually anything wrong with the aircraft, and if so whether it was any fault of Airbus' or a case of dodgy airline maintenance.

Also, apparently there is 1 survivor, most recently reported as a 14 year old girl.
Last edited by FlyingKiwi on Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
FlyingKiwi
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: Auckland

Postby bennz » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:12 pm

Why my comment to bigbird was removerd? dots.gif pirate.gif
Last edited by bennz on Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
bennz
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:55 pm
Posts: 186

Postby AlisterC » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:37 pm

This might interest some of you. I know it's not particularly up to date (perhaps you can find a newer version?)
But in Dec 2007, these results show you are more likely to experience a fatal event in a Boeing than in an Airbus.
http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm

(Don't shoot me! I love Boeing, but I also love Airbus!) tongue.gif
Image
User avatar
AlisterC
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:13 am
Posts: 2543
Location: Nelson, NZ

Postby Naki » Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:21 pm

Albatross wrote:
QUOTE (Albatross @ Jul 1 2009, 03:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
This might interest some of you. I know it's not particularly up to date (perhaps you can find a newer version?)
But in Dec 2007, these results show you are more likely to experience a fatal event in a Boeing than in an Airbus.
http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm

(Don't shoot me! I love Boeing, but I also love Airbus!) tongue.gif




laugh.gif
Last edited by Naki on Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7170
Location: Tauranga

Postby victor_alpha_charlie » Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:47 pm

BigBird wrote:
QUOTE (BigBird @ Jul 1 2009, 12:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What's going to happen if another one comes down in the near future? (Let's hope it doesn't happen! But with the current trend...)


Another Airbus WILL crash, that is 100% certain.

What will happen? Probably the usual- injuries, news reports and an investigation.
User avatar
victor_alpha_charlie
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:09 am
Posts: 2372

Postby Alex » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:54 pm

bennz wrote:
QUOTE (bennz @ Jul 1 2009, 03:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why my comment to bigbird was removerd? dots.gif pirate.gif

Because it was exactly the opposite of what had been asked. Name-calling and unkind implications aren't tolerated. Just a heads up. wink.gif

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby bennz » Thu Jul 02, 2009 9:30 am

Alex wrote:
QUOTE (Alex @ Jul 1 2009, 08:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Because it was exactly the opposite of what had been asked. Name-calling and unkind implications aren't tolerated. Just a heads up. wink.gif

Alex



It wasn't a name calling . I was stating the facts, People should think before they make any statement.
harhar.gif
bennz
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:55 pm
Posts: 186

Postby Alex » Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:55 am

bennz wrote:
QUOTE (bennz @ Jul 2 2009, 09:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It wasn't a name calling . I was stating the facts, People should think before they make any statement.
harhar.gif

We're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

You can continue to support your post, I'm going to continue to support the Moderator's decision to remove it.

I would prefer to continue any discussion regarding it via PM or email, for the sake of keeping the thread on-topic... winkyy.gif

Alex
Alex
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:39 pm
Posts: 3620

Postby benwynn » Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:04 am

It depends what era the A310 was from, the late A310's did have FBW I think..?

Aeroplanes crash, you take that risk every time you get on one, let alone getting in your car to drive to the airport, were the chance of you being killed is many times more.

Airbus is just having a bad run, Boeing has had the same, and will again in the future. It is unfortunate, but such is life.
Last edited by benwynn on Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
benwynn
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 1433
Location: YBBN

Postby bennz » Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:45 pm

Alex wrote:
QUOTE (Alex @ Jul 2 2009, 10:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

You can continue to support your post, I'm going to continue to support the Moderator's decision to remove it.

I would prefer to continue any discussion regarding it via PM or email, for the sake of keeping the thread on-topic... winkyy.gif

Alex



Alex I come with peace surrender.gif
bennz
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:55 pm
Posts: 186

Next

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests