Jogged down to the end of the taxiway and saw Doug Brookers 2 Seat Spitfire nose down in the grass
Not sure how badly damaged it is at this point, fingers crossed
100% ad-free

Naki wrote:QUOTE (Naki @ Dec 3 2009, 12:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>OMG ...its jinxed! Hopefully its not too damaged..maybe we will see it at a public display in 2011???!
NOOOOOOOOO!!!
I'll never get to see the damn thing at this rate. I hope he is ok, except of course his ego is looking a little battered at the moment.Pete Kirby
Visit My Website
creator2003 wrote:QUOTE (creator2003 @ Dec 3 2009, 12:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>GO run get your CAMERA find a cameralol
Who would witness this without a camera I ask you!!! I don't go to the shops without one in the glovebox these days!!!Pete Kirby
Visit My Website
Syncop8r wrote:QUOTE (Syncop8r @ Dec 3 2009, 12:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Here's the (brief) story: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3123771/WW...ter-plane-crash
The stuff article has a pic now....not a great one, but a pic nonetheless...
Not to prejudge anything, but the aircraft looks exactly like it did after the Masterton incident...
Adamski wrote:QUOTE (Adamski @ Dec 3 2009, 01:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>This is just so incredibly sad. Poor Doug ... he must feel absolutely shattered.
Yeah...The article on stuff says:
"Just after today's crash Mr Brooker told Stuff.co.nz: "I don't feel like talking right now"."
Kind of says it all really...


Trolly wrote:QUOTE (Trolly @ Dec 3 2009, 03:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
According to an eye witness, it came in with "came in with quartering tailwind, touched the left wingtip over corrected and hooked right onto the centre grass and collapsed the main undercarriage." There was quite a strong crosswind blowing from the north around 11.45, with 21 active by default- but by the time I left it had swung around to 03. Tricky day for a delicate piece of machinery like this
And if we look at the smoke in the background on the left hand side of the picture we can see that it is indeed quite a tailwind.Last edited by Ace on Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cowpatz wrote:QUOTE (cowpatz @ Dec 3 2009, 09:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Kind of pitiful really when you consider half a century ago 17 year olds with bare double digit flying hours were flying these on a routine basis and into combat no less.
It is tragic to see such a rare airframe abused in this way. Twice in a year is just unacceptable.
Not really getting at you, but I wonder a bit about that comparison. It's well known that in WWI, more pilots were killed in non-combat operations than in actual combat. I don't know about WWII, but I suspect the statistics are there ... somewhere ... and there may have been a pretty high accident rate with Spitfires - but because they may not have ended up in a death, many incidents may not have been recorded. Again - if you look at the statistics (there's a thread here on NZFF about it somewhere) very few pilots were that young. Many already had flying experience with other Air Forces.
What *is* well recorded is the widely accepted view (held by pilots at the time and since) that the Spit's narrowly spaced undercarriage wasn't a totally brilliant design - particularly for an aircraft operating off rough (grass) airstrips. The Me109 is slightly better - but look at the FW190.
I also thought (after the Masterton incident) that maybe there's an art to flying these idiosyncratic old aircraft that somehow just hasn't been passed down from WWII - but having seen how Doug flies everything else, I just can't make myself believe he couldn't fly a Spit "properly".
Return to New Zealand Aviation
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest