RNZAF new NH-90 helicopters

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby dbcunnz » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:43 pm

Are the RNZAF new NH-90 helicopters going to be another NZ defense blunder

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/3...nce-helicopters
Image
OnlineUser avatar
dbcunnz
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:56 pm
Posts: 4009
Location: Blenheim New Zealand

Postby redkiwi » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:14 pm

They seem to be getting a fairly good review over in Australia.
redkiwi
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 193

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:38 pm

I think another blown outta message , fact is if there was a problem , strength it and rebuild for its requirements , little good engineering go's a long way , mods and allsorts will help other custom , could be helpful to us .
Last edited by Ian Warren on Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby 2fst4u » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:24 pm

Germans are known for perfection as we all well know. When they say "Little clearance available" It probably means "Each person will have to duck 2 centimetres to get out without hitting their heads slightly." Abd by "Heavy boots" they probably mean "2 tonne lead footwear". Probably no need to worry.
2fst4u
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:27 pm
Posts: 388
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Postby ZKNBA » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:26 pm

I read somewhere on an airliners.net forum that the dutch navy was having problems with the NH90 due to them being too heavy for its ships.

Does anyone know what is going to happen to the Hueys after the NH90s arrive. Are they going to be scrapped or will they be sold on to civilian operators (would there be any value in doing this?). It would be sad to see them mothballed as they have served for so long and are consequently an important part of our military history.

On another note $771 million is a huge ammount to pay for eight helicopters even if it includes spare parts and training (that is $96 million each). Interestingly wikipedia says that the unit cost is 16 million euros which is about $32million New Zealand dollars.
ZKNBA
Member
 
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 38
Location: NZNE

Postby HueyTeam » Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:48 am

hm, if I went out of the Huey I have more then 2 Centimeters to safe my head. Where is the problem with the NH90 ladies? It´s a middle transport heli, not a CH53. The report of the germans will be true, but I think they will have a platinium edition heli. The Kiwis have the NH90´s (the germans have 2 at this time). What says the NZ Airforce? Are there real life Informations?
Last edited by HueyTeam on Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
----------------------------------------------
I´ve never said my english is good ;-)
----------------------------------------------
happyness is a huey chopper

regards
Andy

Image
User avatar
HueyTeam
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:47 am
Posts: 430
Location: Germany

Postby redkiwi » Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:29 am

HueyTeam wrote:
QUOTE (HueyTeam @ Mar 14 2010, 08:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The Kiwis have the NH90´s (the germans have 2 at this time). What says the NZ Airforce? Are there real life Informations?


The majority of ours are still being built. I believe that at this stage one airframe has begun flight testing but certainly hasn't gone into the testing and evaluation stage where they'll start doing things like flying troops etc.
redkiwi
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 193

Postby deaneb » Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:42 am

It always annoys me when these types of discussions arise, especially in the media. When a procurement of this type is made, it takes years of consideration, so how things can be considered a blunder is beyond me. There are only a few helicopters that fit the category NZ requires and this was deemed to be the best out of those. There will always be an element of uncertainty when purchasing something as new as this as well.
As for the fate of the Hueys, that will be interesting to see. Firstly there will be a transition period as the NH90 is introduced, so I would expect to see all the 3 Sqn people move to the NH90 pretty quickly and the Hueys managed by a contractor perhaps until all the NH90s are delivered and operational. Although the hueys are still "military" there is no reason they could not become civil helos as there are UH-1H operating in the civil world (as opposed to the Bell205B - the civil equivalent). Also would assume this would require US approval and the helos would have to be modified for civil use.
Last edited by deaneb on Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
deaneb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:40 pm
Posts: 1561
Location: Blenheim

Postby redkiwi » Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:35 pm

deaneb wrote:
QUOTE (deaneb @ Mar 14 2010, 10:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
To would assume this would require US approval and the helos would have to be modified for civil use.


Was that not specifically to do with weapons carrying aircraft? I guess the Americans don't want them to help the 'enemy' with relation to drugs/firearms/terrorism etc.
redkiwi
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 193

Postby deaneb » Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:47 am

My understanding is any aircraft built for military purposes. It would be very easy in the case of the Hueys as there are plenty of ex military machines around, so pretty much a given, unlike the Skyhawks. No it does not apply to just weapon carrying aircraft. When the Andovers were disposed of the British had to approve the buyer.
Image
User avatar
deaneb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:40 pm
Posts: 1561
Location: Blenheim

Postby redkiwi » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:23 pm

Oh ok, thanks for clearing that up Deane. It's certainly sad to read about the fate of some of the Andovers, at least a few have been crashed and destroyed due to both bad piloting and poor maintenance.
Last edited by redkiwi on Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
redkiwi
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 193

Postby deaneb » Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:08 pm

redkiwi wrote:
QUOTE (redkiwi @ Mar 16 2010, 03:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Oh ok, thanks for clearing that up Deane. It's certainly sad to read about the fate of some of the Andovers, at least a few have been crashed and destroyed due to both bad piloting and poor maintenance.


I guess that is what happens when they end up in Africa flying dodgy oerations for goodness knows who!! The money to be made probably overides any urgency for quality maintenance and safety. The guy who bought them, also bought the ex RNZAF 727. All the purchasing deals seem to have been done through other covering companies.
Image
User avatar
deaneb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:40 pm
Posts: 1561
Location: Blenheim

Postby Charl » Thu May 20, 2010 5:19 pm

redkiwi wrote:
QUOTE (redkiwi @ Mar 3 2010, 03:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
They seem to be getting a fairly good review over in Australia.

No longer...
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/...ne-failure.html
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby jastheace » Thu May 20, 2010 7:41 pm

Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ May 25 2010, 05:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>



intresting, i was watching one do touch and goes at amberley on tuesday, well it sure had the outline of one, it was darkish!! also watching the f-18's and the c-17's do touch and goes.
In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has yet to lose.

Image
User avatar
jastheace
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:33 pm
Posts: 1032
Location: Hastings

Postby Splitpin » Thu May 20, 2010 7:53 pm

winkyy.gif stop teasing us jas....F-18'S....C-17's.......
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21332
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby deaneb » Thu May 20, 2010 8:32 pm

A single engine failure due to an unknown cause is hardly grounds to deem the whole helicopter no good!!

Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ May 20 2010, 05:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Image
User avatar
deaneb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:40 pm
Posts: 1561
Location: Blenheim

Postby markll » Thu May 20, 2010 10:53 pm

deaneb wrote:
QUOTE (deaneb @ May 20 2010, 08:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
A single engine failure due to an unknown cause is hardly grounds to deem the whole helicopter no good!!


You'd assume they were just playing it safe in grounding the rest of the fleet...

I read that NHI had sent one of the NH90s NFH (NATO Frigate Helicopter) to Aus to show off and try to convince their defence chiefs to buy that as well, could be thats what Jas saw at Amberly? And on that score, WTH is this all about (from that article on flight global):

QUOTE
commonality in avionics and airframe between the NH90 and MRH90 as an advantage in this competition[/quote]

So, I always thought that MRH-90 was the designation the Aussies gave their NH-90s - that they were the same thing? Is this just a case of some reporter or editor making things confusing when they don't need to be? Far as I can tell, what they meant was "...between the NH90 NFH and the NH90..." ?
Image Image
User avatar
markll
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:19 am
Posts: 345
Location: Whitby

Postby jastheace » Sat May 22, 2010 12:22 pm

markll wrote:
QUOTE (markll @ May 25 2010, 10:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You'd assume they were just playing it safe in grounding the rest of the fleet...

I read that NHI had sent one of the NH90s NFH (NATO Frigate Helicopter) to Aus to show off and try to convince their defence chiefs to buy that as well, could be thats what Jas saw at Amberly? And on that score, WTH is this all about (from that article on flight global):



So, I always thought that MRH-90 was the designation the Aussies gave their NH-90s - that they were the same thing? Is this just a case of some reporter or editor making things confusing when they don't need to be? Far as I can tell, what they meant was "...between the NH90 NFH and the NH90..." ?



could be, but before the light got too dark i am almost 100% certain that there was aussie roundals on it, oh and as far as teasing goes, i also looked at the two wedgetail 737's (from a distance)
In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has yet to lose.

Image
User avatar
jastheace
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:33 pm
Posts: 1032
Location: Hastings

Postby markll » Sat May 22, 2010 12:38 pm

jastheace wrote:
QUOTE (jastheace @ May 22 2010, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
could be, but before the light got too dark i am almost 100% certain that there was aussie roundals on it, oh and as far as teasing goes, i also looked at the two wedgetail 737's (from a distance)


Those are wierd - not sure I'd WANT to see them! smile.gif

Nah, I'm just jealous. Seriously I was over there at xmas/new year time, and I saw more unusual stuff in a month than I've seen here in years! F18s, DC3s, a DC4, ultralights, and even a friggin Eurocopter Tiger...and that was without even TRYING to go spotting!

So, yeah, definitely jealous of ya...
Image Image
User avatar
markll
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:19 am
Posts: 345
Location: Whitby

Postby jastheace » Sat May 22, 2010 1:18 pm

markll wrote:
QUOTE (markll @ May 27 2010, 12:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Those are wierd - not sure I'd WANT to see them! smile.gif

Nah, I'm just jealous. Seriously I was over there at xmas/new year time, and I saw more unusual stuff in a month than I've seen here in years! F18s, DC3s, a DC4, ultralights, and even a friggin Eurocopter Tiger...and that was without even TRYING to go spotting!

So, yeah, definitely jealous of ya...



well i won't mentions the aircraft that i used to refuel, amany blackhawks (got to get right up close and have a real good look at them) dauntlass, yaks, seafire, doves, hunter, l139, B25 firebomber, islanders, PAC750's , then there is the caribou f-111's c-130's


ooops i said i wasn't going to mention those tongue.gif
Last edited by jastheace on Sat May 22, 2010 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has yet to lose.

Image
User avatar
jastheace
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:33 pm
Posts: 1032
Location: Hastings

Next

Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests