100% ad-free


HueyTeam wrote:QUOTE (HueyTeam @ Mar 14 2010, 08:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>The Kiwis have the NH90´s (the germans have 2 at this time). What says the NZ Airforce? Are there real life Informations?
The majority of ours are still being built. I believe that at this stage one airframe has begun flight testing but certainly hasn't gone into the testing and evaluation stage where they'll start doing things like flying troops etc.
deaneb wrote:QUOTE (deaneb @ Mar 14 2010, 10:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>To would assume this would require US approval and the helos would have to be modified for civil use.
Was that not specifically to do with weapons carrying aircraft? I guess the Americans don't want them to help the 'enemy' with relation to drugs/firearms/terrorism etc.
redkiwi wrote:QUOTE (redkiwi @ Mar 16 2010, 03:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Oh ok, thanks for clearing that up Deane. It's certainly sad to read about the fate of some of the Andovers, at least a few have been crashed and destroyed due to both bad piloting and poor maintenance.
I guess that is what happens when they end up in Africa flying dodgy oerations for goodness knows who!! The money to be made probably overides any urgency for quality maintenance and safety. The guy who bought them, also bought the ex RNZAF 727. All the purchasing deals seem to have been done through other covering companies.
redkiwi wrote:QUOTE (redkiwi @ Mar 3 2010, 03:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>They seem to be getting a fairly good review over in Australia.
No longer...
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/...ne-failure.html
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ May 25 2010, 05:19 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
intresting, i was watching one do touch and goes at amberley on tuesday, well it sure had the outline of one, it was darkish!! also watching the f-18's and the c-17's do touch and goes.In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has yet to lose.
Charl wrote:QUOTE (Charl @ May 20 2010, 05:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
deaneb wrote:QUOTE (deaneb @ May 20 2010, 08:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>A single engine failure due to an unknown cause is hardly grounds to deem the whole helicopter no good!!
You'd assume they were just playing it safe in grounding the rest of the fleet...
I read that NHI had sent one of the NH90s NFH (NATO Frigate Helicopter) to Aus to show off and try to convince their defence chiefs to buy that as well, could be thats what Jas saw at Amberly? And on that score, WTH is this all about (from that article on flight global):QUOTEcommonality in avionics and airframe between the NH90 and MRH90 as an advantage in this competition[/quote]
So, I always thought that MRH-90 was the designation the Aussies gave their NH-90s - that they were the same thing? Is this just a case of some reporter or editor making things confusing when they don't need to be? Far as I can tell, what they meant was "...between the NH90 NFH and the NH90..." ?
markll- Forum Addict
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:19 am
- Posts: 345
- Location: Whitby
markll wrote:QUOTE (markll @ May 25 2010, 10:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>You'd assume they were just playing it safe in grounding the rest of the fleet...
I read that NHI had sent one of the NH90s NFH (NATO Frigate Helicopter) to Aus to show off and try to convince their defence chiefs to buy that as well, could be thats what Jas saw at Amberly? And on that score, WTH is this all about (from that article on flight global):
So, I always thought that MRH-90 was the designation the Aussies gave their NH-90s - that they were the same thing? Is this just a case of some reporter or editor making things confusing when they don't need to be? Far as I can tell, what they meant was "...between the NH90 NFH and the NH90..." ?
could be, but before the light got too dark i am almost 100% certain that there was aussie roundals on it, oh and as far as teasing goes, i also looked at the two wedgetail 737's (from a distance)In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has yet to lose.
jastheace wrote:QUOTE (jastheace @ May 22 2010, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>could be, but before the light got too dark i am almost 100% certain that there was aussie roundals on it, oh and as far as teasing goes, i also looked at the two wedgetail 737's (from a distance)
Those are wierd - not sure I'd WANT to see them!
Nah, I'm just jealous. Seriously I was over there at xmas/new year time, and I saw more unusual stuff in a month than I've seen here in years! F18s, DC3s, a DC4, ultralights, and even a friggin Eurocopter Tiger...and that was without even TRYING to go spotting!
So, yeah, definitely jealous of ya...
markll wrote:QUOTE (markll @ May 27 2010, 12:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Those are wierd - not sure I'd WANT to see them!
Nah, I'm just jealous. Seriously I was over there at xmas/new year time, and I saw more unusual stuff in a month than I've seen here in years! F18s, DC3s, a DC4, ultralights, and even a friggin Eurocopter Tiger...and that was without even TRYING to go spotting!
So, yeah, definitely jealous of ya...
well i won't mentions the aircraft that i used to refuel, amany blackhawks (got to get right up close and have a real good look at them) dauntlass, yaks, seafire, doves, hunter, l139, B25 firebomber, islanders, PAC750's , then there is the caribou f-111's c-130's
ooops i said i wasn't going to mention thoseLast edited by jastheace on Sat May 22, 2010 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.In the ongoing battle between objects made of aluminum going hundreds of miles per hour and the ground going zero miles per hour, the ground has yet to lose.
Return to New Zealand Aviation
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests