Major Defence Shake-up

A place for 'real world' pilots and aviation enthusiasts to discuss their hobby

Postby Charl » Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:47 am

Lots of tasks handed off to civvies (a worldwide trend, really)
Herks to be replaced by 2020 - surely by another...J version?
And 3 more A109's than previously included in the new buy.
I wonder how they get to cost $15 million a copy?

No mention of UAV's anywhere...

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article....jectid=10684967
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby Naki » Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:42 am

Yeah I would say the J model ..if not the A400M (probably too expensive) or the Embraer KC-390 (maybe too small and yet to fly)..it also mentioned the 757s which maybe replaced at the same time..so maybe a slightly bigger fleet of J model Hercs and a BBJ? IMO they should of already had J model Hercs instead wasting money trying to update the current 45 year old ones.

$15M seems way too much for one A-109LUH ..maybe thats for three?

In the document itself (which the Herald omits), it outlines the Purchase of maritime patrol/light transport aircraft to replace the King Airs. Possibly Q300s although it does talk about STOL so hopefully this will mean something more useful such as the C-235 or C-295 which have rear loading ramps.

Other aviation related items mentioned is that the Orions would be replaced in 2025 with something similar in capability - this would only mean P-8s (wont be cheap) and that the Seaprites will be upgraded or replaced within 5 years. My guess that they will be upgraded as they arent that old.

Who know what will happen between now and 2025 and no doubt other Governments will have different ideas.
In any case we arent going backwards with the changes (just look at the massive cuts in the UK and Germany and to a certain extent the US) and strengthens what we already have. No sign of a ressurected AFC though...which isn't surprising
Last edited by Naki on Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Naki
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 7170
Location: Tauranga

Postby Ian Warren » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:24 pm

You replace a C130 with a C130Z model laugh.gif , with the upgrades they probally be able to sell them off to a third world country , think the A400s maybe a little to big , the P8 would be the obvious choice for maritime patrol , any thing smaller would not have the range .

I would say your right with the costing on those A109s .

Strange to think everyone downsizing forces , wonder what would happen if the pooh really hit the fan , all us civvies will flying our combat strikes from the desktop with UVAs . winkyy.gif
Last edited by Ian Warren on Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Charl » Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:36 pm

Maritime Patrol, and the Search part of SAR... these are functions for much smaller and cheaper unmanned vehicles.
More correctly, Remotely Piloted Vehicles (which can loiter for many hours autonomously, too).

When you find a target of interest, launch the expensive hardware to do stuff, like drop a life-raft, or kill it.
Seems like a no-brainer to me.
User avatar
Charl
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
Posts: 9691
Location: Auckland

Postby deaneb » Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:43 pm

Naki wrote:
QUOTE (Naki @ Nov 3 2010, 10:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
IMO they should of already had J model Hercs instead wasting money trying to update the current 45 year old ones.


At the time the J model was consider, apart from being beyond the budget, they were farly new and there were issues with capability. They were ok for medium haul transport, but rough strip operations were not so flash with "plastic propellers" and other issues. Not sure if most of these have been sorted or not, but the Aussies had limitations on pax hours in the back (5 hours a time) due to the associated vibration and fatigue from the props as well. Thats why they had a Squadron of J's to do the transport and another Squadron of E's? or H's? that do all the rough and tough combat stuff.
Image
User avatar
deaneb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:40 pm
Posts: 1561
Location: Blenheim

Postby deaneb » Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:51 pm

Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ Nov 3 2010, 02:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Maritime Patrol, and the Search part of SAR... these are functions for much smaller and cheaper unmanned vehicles.
More correctly, Remotely Piloted Vehicles (which can loiter for many hours autonomously, too).

When you find a target of interest, launch the expensive hardware to do stuff, like drop a life-raft, or kill it.
Seems like a no-brainer to me.


Nice in theory, but we are too small a Force to justify remote vehicles and then have other aircraft sitting waiting for an as required basis. The Orions (and 5 Squadron) have always been capable of doing their job well, because they are out there doing a variety of roles all the time, either patrolling / searching or training. All this means a ready and competent capability.
Image
User avatar
deaneb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:40 pm
Posts: 1561
Location: Blenheim


Return to New Zealand Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests