Old METARS?

A place to converse about the general aspects of flight simulation in New Zealand

Postby ardypilot » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:12 am

Does anyone know if old achived METARs or SPECIs can be found online anywhere?

In particular, I'd be interested to find one from between 6pm and 7pm last night at NZAA, to see if there was any mention of the funnel cloud overhead the city at that time.

Cheers.
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby Olderndirt » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:22 pm

Trolly wrote:
QUOTE (Trolly @ Mar 9 2011,2:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Does anyone know if old achived METARs or SPECIs can be found online anywhere?

In particular, I'd be interested to find one from between 6pm and 7pm last night at NZAA, to see if there was any mention of the funnel cloud overhead the city at that time.

Cheers.
If the local Met office saw/recorded it on weather radar, they'd have issued some level of warning to be spread by the various media.
Image
User avatar
Olderndirt
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1774
Location: Rochester, Washington USA

Postby slopit12 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:04 pm

You might find it here

http://www.jetplan.com/weather/html/text/J...AdHocForm.shtml

Type in NZAA, I think you can look at previous Metar for up to 24hours ago.
slopit12
Member
 
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:38 am
Posts: 86

Postby ardypilot » Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:31 pm

Thanks guys- I checked them last night but there were no sign of the infamous 'FC' to be seen. Must have been on a separate SPECI.
User avatar
ardypilot
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:01 am
Posts: 6802
Location: Auckland

Postby SA227 » Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:23 pm

Checked with the Mrs who is an aviation met expert and it should have been included in the main body of the metar only if it was within 8km of the airfield and should have been added to the remarks if it was within 16km.
Of course all that assumes that somebody actually saw it and all the controllers would normally be facing the other way.
SA227
Forum Addict
 
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:11 pm
Posts: 368

Postby ZKIWI » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:05 pm

SA227 wrote:
QUOTE (SA227 @ Mar 11 2011,6:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Checked with the Mrs who is an aviation met expert and it should have been included in the main body of the metar only if it was within 8km of the airfield and should have been added to the remarks if it was within 16km.
Of course all that assumes that somebody actually saw it and all the controllers would normally be facing the other way.


It would have been issued as a SIGMET.
ZKIWI
Member
 
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:51 pm
Posts: 146
Location: Feilding


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests