NZFF

by **Adamski** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:34 pm

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jun 22 2011,8:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
WHAT!!!......bra guy, i had you pinned as an F-111 kind of guy....well....airtruk with burners, now i hope young AB see's this post....food for thought

Well here's my (relatively modern) USAF list:

F-4, F-15, F-16, A-10, B-52

F-14, F-111

F/A -18, B2B

F-117

B1B

Any chopper

... that should stir things up a bit

by **Charl** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:55 pm

Takes all sorts I s'pose.
But I have to admit to my shame I derated this thread from +5 to -5 when I saw the F-14 placed in the second line.
I realised too late:
1. It's a Splitpin thread not an Adamski thread, and
2. Adam made a little mistake, and a quiet word in a dark alley would've seen that swiftly corrected.
Sorry, chaps.

by **Ian Warren** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:11 pm

Well Adam , guess you cover then 60s to today for the US armed forces but if you see a Lancer come cruzing in across a city you would change your mind . Elegant would be the chosen word .

As for Helicopters its not pooh pooh pooh .... its more chook chook chook

by **Adamski** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:43 pm

Charl wrote:
QUOTE (Charl @ Jun 22 2011,8:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But I have to admit to my shame I derated this thread from +5 to -5 when I saw the F-14 placed in the second line.

For some reason, the F-14 never looked "right" to me, whereas the F-15 is so elegant ... and the F-16 is a beauty.

But of course, they're all horrible capitalist planes

... and nothing compared to the Su-27 (or even MiG-29 at a push).

Getting back on-topic ... the Tornado isn't a "natural" beauty, but somehow *does* look "right". Interesting how we all see things so differently!

@Ian ... I've seen a few Lancers at shows .. they *almost* look right ... but I have to admit - they looked pretty menacing/frightening.

by **Splitpin** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:55 pm

See what you did Adam...Ive been de-rated by Charl.....F-14? 117? ....LITTLE BUDDY, YOU NEED HELP.these are awesome aircraft.......Charl, Im sorry....i have no idea who he is.

by **Ian Warren** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:05 pm

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jun 22 2011,10:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i have no idea who he is.

What Marty .. You told me he was ' BRA MAN ' latest in the long line off super hero,s ... can leap tall piles off Lingerie in a single bound

by **Splitpin** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:09 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 22 2011,10:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What Marty .. You told me he was ' BRA MAN ' latest in the long line off super hero,s ... can leap tall piles off Lingerie in a single bound

go to sleep Ian.......i think we may get edited soon

by **Ian Warren** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:12 pm

Oh that,s right , its 'BRA GUY'

..... boy the was a hell off a Tornado was is it not

by **Splitpin** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:18 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jun 22 2011,10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Oh that,s right , its 'BRA GUY' ..... boy the was a hell off a Tornado was is it not

Ok, i think thats enough....this is a screenshot thread....and Ive already been derated

by **Charl** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:04 pm

Adamski wrote:
QUOTE (Adamski @ Jun 22 2011,9:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For some reason, the F-14 never looked "right" to me...

Built for purpose...to carry a Phoenix missile.
Form follows function.
I uploaded this in 1080p, turn up the volume to do it justice

I do like Flankers too, but the Tomcat...aahh there is magic.

by **Adamski** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:48 pm

Great video, Charl ... it's a stunning model isn't it? Great sound too! I must admit, the detail is really quite appealing

Does it need Acceleration to run - or will SP2 do?

Strangely, though, the better the military planes are in FSX, the more disappointed I am that you can't "do stuff" with all that fancy hardware. I won the CS Weapon FX thing as a prize and it's seriously awful. Of all things to win!

I suppose my favourite "movie" sim has to be LOMAC series ... some unbelievable videos out there. At least in LOMAC you can get a bit destructive ... but I never last long enough to make it to the target zone!

by **Ian Warren** » Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:56 pm

Guess the Christmas sale from Iris , wicked price for a lotta fun

by **connor** » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:53 am

Adamski wrote:
QUOTE (Adamski @ Jun 22 2011,9:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For some reason, the F-14 never looked "right" to me, whereas the F-15 is so elegant ...

HAVE YOU NOT SEEN TOPGUN????

by **Naki** » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:46 am

Adamski wrote:
QUOTE (Adamski @ Jun 22 2011,8:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well here's my (relatively modern) USAF list:
B1B

... that should stir things up a bit

B-1B

bad or B-1B

good? IMV its stunning with its long flowing lines....not forgetting the power and noise it generates...and dont stand behind one when it takes off!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VYwhzt8wiU...feature=related

by **Timmo** » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:25 am

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jun 12 2011,6:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
PS: Brendan, how do i get that heat haze in a specific area, and not all over the screen?

Make a selection of the required area first, then apply the filter.

by **Charl** » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:24 am

Adamski wrote:
QUOTE (Adamski @ Jun 22 2011,11:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
...Does it need Acceleration to run - or will SP2 do?...

Neither...I do not speak FSX, at all.
But Ian knows his product: freeware FS9 Iris F-14 reworked by Steve Hinson.

The F-15E Strike Eagle is the one US aircraft I would take to any war, any time, however.

by **Adamski** » Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:08 pm

Timmo wrote:
QUOTE (Timmo @ Jun 23 2011,10:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Make a selection of the required area first, then apply the filter.

Yep ... and don't forget to use a "feathered" selection so the edges are soft ...

by **Splitpin** » Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:36 pm

Timmo and Adam...thanks for the tip

NZFF

Tornado for Adam

Who is online