




and the Charl shot

Picture credits to: John Jauchler, Augustas Didzgalvis, Rick Schlamp, Wim Callaert, David Lilienthal
100% ad-free






dbcunnz wrote:QUOTE (dbcunnz @ Jul 3 2011,12:52 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Now that looks like an aeroplane not like a one of those Cheap URO flying BUSES
Your right Doug....an awesome bit of kit.Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 3 2011,12:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Dang .. now that is pretty
Sure is Ian.....is the pax version in service yet?
Splitpin- NZFF Pro
- Topic author
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
- Posts: 21332
- Location: Christchurch NZ
deeknow wrote:QUOTE (deeknow @ Jul 3 2011,8:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I know we marvel at the 74 a lot round these parts, but it's just such a true genius piece of industrial design/art, incredible that it still looks so good after over 40years
I think so....if anything it gets better looking. As for its rival, the only way to improve that would be to stop making the butt ugly thing.
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 3 2011,12:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Dang .. now that is pretty
I sure is, but heck it is long. On trans-continental flights, Pilots are going to be in a different timezone to the passengers!
Splitpin wrote:QUOTE (Splitpin @ Jul 3 2011,1:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Sure is Ian.....is the pax version in service yet?
Not to my knowledge , still going through trails , I would love to see a break down off parts , as with the 400 series was a totally different aircraft to the 100/200/300 types .
Ian Warren wrote:QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Jul 3 2011,12:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Not to my knowledge , still going through trails , I would love to see a break down off parts , as with the 400 series was a totally different aircraft to the 100/200/300 types .
That is the Pax version pictured above and it is a stunner.
Last edited by HamiltonWest on Mon Jul 04, 2011 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.Awesome in NZ
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49222841@N06/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests