Pretty good up high.


Not so much down low.

100% ad-free





connor wrote:QUOTE (connor @ Oct 1 2011,8:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Nice pics,but it is annoying especially when you've invested significant bandwidth in a scenery, to find that it's in fact rubbish at anything below 10,000ft.
Ohhh so true, even worse if it was payware.............Last edited by Rotordude on Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.Regards always
Pete
connor wrote:QUOTE (connor @ Sep 30 2011,1:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Nice pics,But difficult to complain when it's freebut it is annoying especially when you've invested significant bandwidth in a scenery, to find that it's in fact rubbish at anything below 10,000ft.
.
Rotordude wrote:QUOTE (Rotordude @ Sep 30 2011,2:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Olderndirt, nice up top, but yes down low a bit sad.A while back I tried the Ozx download and must admit the stratification of rock formations and all-around color was better but that's just a tough scenery to depict. Figuring how much per acre ORBX is getting for their stuff, if they did this my credit card would spontaneously combust.
Not trying to hijack the thread, but if you want the Grand Canyon, there is only one real option IMO.
http://aussiex.org/forum/index.php?/files/...-holgermesh-v2/ "2m/pixel, autogen, 10mtr mesh and nightlights"......... Ohh did I mention it was free. So taking into account the exchange rate as well it has to be a bargain![]()
Ohhh so true, even worse if it was payware.............
Users browsing this forum: jankees and 6 guests