C-17 & C-5 2 Screens.

Post and comment on screen captures from the beautiful game here. Home of the monthly screenshot competition

Postby Splitpin » Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:08 pm

A study in gray..........




and a "boomers" night view of a thirsty C-5






Fsx, area 51 C-5 & C-17.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21333
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:43 pm

Two off the greats , I still dou't the the 17s gear will equal the C5 that crawling under nether it but i would like to see a C5M airshow display , no way to compare against the early version but guest the display should equal the AN124 , as far as my Virtavia C17 .. like to compare both against the AREA51 , biggest thing is A51 will get the extra support since V/A is now near defunct .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Splitpin » Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:28 pm

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Oct 14 2011,6:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Two off the greats , I still dou't the the 17s gear will equal the C5 that crawling under nether it but i would like to see a C5M airshow display , no way to compare against the early version but guest the display should equal the AN124 , as far as my Virtavia C17 .. like to compare both against the AREA51 , biggest thing is A51 will get the extra support since V/A is now near defunct .


As far as externals go, Area 51 has it all over anyone else doing the C-5 or C-17(my opinion)....only thing with the C-17 (i think) its a bit light on texture around the landing gear. Now, if they decide to do a 141........ wub.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21333
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:45 pm

Splitpin wrote:
QUOTE (Splitpin @ Oct 14 2011,9:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Now, if they decide to do a 141........ wub.gif

I,m with you Marty , like everything about VX6 , US NAVY and the the USAF Military machine in Christchurch , thumbup1.gif

As boring as many said about Starlifter , seen the A all the way to last , course no difference between a B.C,D , really no diff other than paint and the stretch and other for the Kiddies the late 'D' was all button push navigation if we get one for FSX .
Last edited by Ian Warren on Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby connor » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:22 am

Once again SP, love the military heavies. drool.gif I also like the night vision thing as well. I did an entire "off the radar flight" in the Iris F-16D with the night vision once.
connor
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:01 am
Posts: 1616
Location: Christchurch

Postby Splitpin » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:15 am

connor wrote:
QUOTE (connor @ Oct 15 2011,10:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Once again SP, love the military heavies. drool.gif I also like the night vision thing as well. I did an entire "off the radar flight" in the Iris F-16D with the night vision once.
o
Thanks Connor, i wasnt sure about the night vision thing...still not....but its something new. Im right into the whole" landing config screen thing" at the moment, so could be a few more on the way winkyy.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21333
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Splitpin » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:18 am

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Oct 14 2011,9:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I,m with you Marty , like everything about VX6 , US NAVY and the the USAF Military machine in Christchurch , thumbup1.gif

As boring as many said about Starlifter , seen the A all the way to last , course no difference between a B.C,D , really no diff other than paint and the stretch and other for the Kiddies the late 'D' was all button push navigation if we get one for FSX .

I wonder if i could get the old Alpha 141's to run in FSX.?...just for screens.....the lightnings moved over ok, and didnt look to bad.
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21333
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:37 am

I had i running in FSX pre SP1/SP2 Acceleration days , even had an old full metal paint on the burner , cold war thread shows it there .
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51

Postby Splitpin » Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:38 am

Ian Warren wrote:
QUOTE (Ian Warren @ Oct 16 2011,10:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I had i running in FSX pre SP1/SP2 Acceleration days , even had an old full metal paint on the burner , cold war thread shows it there .

Thanks Mr W.....I'll have a play later thumbup1.gif
User avatar
Splitpin
NZFF Pro
 
Topic author
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:15 pm
Posts: 21333
Location: Christchurch NZ

Postby Olderndirt » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:17 pm

your Galaxy looks very purposeful. Often wonder how it'd have been if Boeing had won that contract with what became the 747. Turned out, in the long run, to be a winner for Boeing.
Image
User avatar
Olderndirt
Senior Member
 
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:36 pm
Posts: 1774
Location: Rochester, Washington USA

Postby Ian Warren » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:38 pm

Dave , Interesting that idea , the politics and the moneys and course Lockheed,s position at the time , quiet intriguing look at concept drawings but even thinking about it , did Lockheed rush the program after all we no about the re-wing program , and maybe Boeing had a winner in respect the 747F was able to lift more than a C5A . This is has all changed with the re-engined C5M , did Boeing have it right from the start .
Last edited by Ian Warren on Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ian Warren
NZFF Pro
 
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:23 pm
Posts: 41187
Location: AREA 51


Return to Screenshots

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests